Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: A Primer On the Ruger Blackhawk In .30 Carbine

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Location
    Outside the Moderate Damage Radius

    A Primer On the Ruger Blackhawk In .30 Carbine

    In my opinion the .30 Carbine round makes a better handgun cartridge than a rifle round. My .30 carbine Ruger is more accurate than my WW2 Inland DCM carbine. Two-inch 50 yard groups, fired from sandbags with iron sights firing hand loads are easy, as are 4-5 inch groups off sandbags at 100 yards! The .30 Carbine cartridge is outstanding as a flat-shooting varmint or small game cartridge, fired from the Ruger Blackhawk or T/C Contender.

    Name:  100ydsRuger12inchGongLC44Ball.jpg
Views: 1023
Size:  71.1 KB
    LC44 Ball Ammo at 100 yards
    Name:  Ruger30Carb100yds31-100T7pt4AutoComp.jpg
Views: 1287
Size:  46.3 KB
    Accurate 31-100T with 7.4 grains AutoComp at 100 yards.

    Firing “full charge” loads is unpleasant without adequate ear protection. Lake City 1944 Ball ammo chronographed 1586 fps from my 7-1/2” Blackhawk, versus 1981 fps from the Inland US Carbine. Cast bullet loads in the Ruger, using the minimum charges which cycle the Carbine, gave 1300-1500 fps. Fired from the M1 carbine they approximate full charge .32-20 loads suitable for the Winchester 1892, giving 1600-1700 fps.

    The same powder charges and bullets used successfully in the 7.62x25 Tokarev perform well in the Ruger. A charge of 7.4 grains of Olin Auto Comp, measured with the RCBS Little Dandy Rotor #9 tames muzzle blast to moderate levels, functions the carbine reliably, gives excellent accuracy, and drops the empty brass from the carbine at your feet. Plainbased cast bullets of 14-15 BHN give good accuracy up to 1500 fps in the revolver without leading and 100 yard groups of 3-4 inches with iron sights, versus 5-6 inches for WCC44 and LC44 Ball ammo. My cast bullet loads use Accurate 31-100T cast 15 BHN and sized .310” with Lee Liquid Alox and 7.4 grains of Olin AutoComp, metered with the RCBS Little Dandy Powder Measure Rotor #9. A satisfactory full-charge load with 31-100T is 14 grains of IMR4227, measured with RCBS Little Dandy Rotor #18. This approached the velocity of factory ammunition, shot to the same point of impact as factory loads and didn’t lead, but was not the most accurate load.

    Since the 30 Carbine headspaces on the case mouth, case length is critical. Cases which are too short fail to give reliable ignition in the Ruger revolver, because the hammer blow simply drives cases more deeply into the chambers. If cases are too long, their heads bind against the recoil shield and impair cylinder rotation. Failure to pay attention to case length causes problems. Ignition problems in the Ruger are avoided by eliminating cases shorter than 1.28,” or trimming any longer than 1.285.” New Starline brass is held within 1.280- 1.285 inches and I recommend that you do likewise with yours! If your .30 carbine brass is uniform, and of correct near-maximum length, there should be no issues.

    Carbide sizing dies eliminate the need for case lube. Any residual oil or greased not removed causes cases to set back upon firing and bind against the revolver recoil shield. Chambers of the Ruger revolver absolutely must be kept free of oil. Most reloading manuals recommend using Small Rifle primers for full-charge loads in the .30 carbine. While this is necessary in maximum loads to prevent pierced primers or cylinder lockup due to primer flow, I prefer to use standard small pistol primers in the Ruger revolver and limit revolver velocity to 1500 fps with 85-100 grain bullets and to 1400 fps with bullets over 100 grains. Using standard small pistol primers gives a reliable visual indicator when pressures exceed about 30,000 psi, which seems to be the point problems at which problems are more likely to occur. With proper bullet fit, moderate loads, and using a taper-crimp die, inertial dislodgement of either jacketed or cast bullets is not a problem. Cast bullets weighing more than about 130 grains are not properly stabilized at realistic revolver velocities in the Ruger’s 20-inch twist of rifling.

    Cylinder throats of some Ruger .30 Carbine revolvers may be found as tight as .307-.308” diameter. Cast bullet diameter is limited by chamber and brass dimensions to no more than .310” when using .30 Carbine brass. Some users hone their cylinder throats to .312,” which enables using the same bullets as for the .32 H&R Magnum or .327 Federal. This requires use of Starline .32-20 brass, which is thinner walled to provide adequate neck release clearance for the larger bullet diameter. The New Model Blackhawk .30 Carbine cylinder does not have recessed case heads as did earlier guns. There is adequate head clearance for Starline .32-20 brass and this adaptation works very well for those users.

    I find it most appropriate to view the .30 Carbine Ruger as a “rimless .32-20.” I do not use .32-20 brass for assembling full-charge loads in my .30 Ruger. This is because I own several older .32-20 revolvers so I limit all loads in .32-20 brass to standard pressure loads which are safe in the old revolvers. It is absolutely necessary to have a fail-safe method to distinguish “hot Ruger loads” if you also own an older and weaker .32-20 rifle or revolver. Doing so avoids the risk of putting a Hot “Ruger Load” in a nice old gun and either ruining it or injuring yourself.

    My Ruger revolver dates from 1977 and came with .310 cylinder throats from the factory. I find this ideal. Cast bullets which “fit” give excellent accuracy. While the .310 cylinder throats are not “optimum” for the .307-.308 jacketed bullets found in factory FMJ or soft point .30 carbine ammunition, my revolver still groups about as well with GI ammunition my WW2 Inland carbine! Best grouping of jacketed bullets is with the .309” diameter Hornady XTP, intended for the 7.62x25 Tokarev or .30 Mauser. The jacket thickness, skiving and cavity geometry of the XTP jacketed bullets enables them to perform well at the full range of velocities obtained from the .30 Carbine Ruger and the M1 carbine.

    AutoComp doesn’t give the highest velocity in the M1 carbine, but equals the velocity of full-charge loads, when fired from the Ruger revolver. It does so with less muzzle flash and blast, and better accuracy using less powder. So, what’s not to like? K.I.S.S. Principle!

  2. #2
    Abducted by Aliens Borderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Camano Island WA.
    As a general rule I would say a Ruger revolver would be more accurate than most M1 carbines, using the same ammo. That might have something to do with the fact that many carbine barrels are used up. I had an Inland that was about minute of pie plate at 100 yds. A muzzle erosion gauge measured that barrel at 3.5. 1.0 would be a new bore. I now have a Winchester barrel that measures 1.5 which means it was replaced as the receiver is an Inland 43. That rifle will shoot 3 MOA, maybe a little better.

    I've never owned a Ruger 30 carbine but just exactly what you described was demonstrated to me years ago by someone who owned both a Ruger and a carbine. The standard for carbines when built was 4 MOA.
    Last edited by Borderland; 05-30-2021 at 03:04 PM.
    In the P-F basket of deplorables.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Outpost75 View Post
    I find it most appropriate to view the .30 Carbine Ruger as a “rimless .32-20.” I do not use .32-20 brass for assembling full-charge loads in my .30 Ruger. This is because I own several older .32-20 revolvers so I limit all loads in .32-20 brass to standard pressure loads which are safe in the old revolvers. It is absolutely necessary to have a fail-safe method to distinguish “hot Ruger loads” if you also own an older and weaker .32-20 rifle or revolver. Doing so avoids the risk of putting a Hot “Ruger Load” in a nice old gun and either ruining it or injuring yourself.
    Thanks for this information, but I think it could end up costing me a fortune.

    I'm interested in using the 30 Carbine in a revolver with mild loads. What other issues are involved with using 32-20 brass in the Blackhawk? Can you just swap it in?


    Okie John
    “The reliability of the 30-06 on most of the world’s non-dangerous game is so well established as to be beyond intelligent dispute.” Finn Aagaard
    "Don't fuck with it" seems to prevent the vast majority of reported issues." BehindBlueI's

  4. #4
    I keep telling myself that, should I win the lottery, items #1 and 2 on the list would be a Blackhawk and Marlin Levermatic - both in 30 carbine. I should start buying tickets if I want a chance for it to happen.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Location
    Outside the Moderate Damage Radius
    Quote Originally Posted by okie john View Post
    Thanks for this information, but I think it could end up costing me a fortune.

    I'm interested in using the 30 Carbine in a revolver with mild loads. What other issues are involved with using 32-20 brass in the Blackhawk? Can you just swap it in?


    Okie John
    Only thing you need to do is trim the cases to 1.28".
    Older .32-20 brass may be up to 1.305" If cases are long you'll have hard cylinder rotation.

  6. #6
    Member Zeke38's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    North Cenral Idaho
    Dang. love those targets! My brother had one of the Carbine Blackhawks back in the 70s. Muzzle blast and report would blow your ears off! Heck of a squirrel gun! Passed up several over the years due to the muzzle blast, but they look like they might be fun now.

  7. #7
    What’s the consensus on the Ruger Single-Seven in .327 versus the Blackhawk in .30 carbine?

    It looks like the .30 carbine will have more top end (and blast), but for the most part the .327 will do everything else, in a handier package, but I’ve never shot either.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2021
    Location
    Outside the Moderate Damage Radius
    Quote Originally Posted by john c View Post
    What’s the consensus on the Ruger Single-Seven in .327 versus the Blackhawk in .30 carbine?

    It looks like the .30 carbine will have more top end (and blast), but for the most part the .327 will do everything else, in a handier package, but I’ve never shot either.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Performance of .327 factory ammo is similar, but around here .327 ammo is unobtanium, so people end up shooting .32 H&R Magnum or .32 S&W Long in them. In very limited testing I've done the accuracy and velocity of those shorter rounds suffers in the .327 longer chamber, so using .30 carbine and .32-20 seems to be a happy combination particularly if you already have rifles and revolvers in those calibers.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •