One thing that bugs me is the claim that the antis "invented" the term (as far as applying it to non-FA firearms) in the '80s.
We should all know that the "full auto" meaning was a working definition or understanding, if not rigorously and precisely delimited category, describing a general type of actual military arm, in official use going back into at least the 60s if not the 50s. (I haven't personally seen military weapons ID manuals going back that far.)
Jack O'Connor's 1970 book, The Hunting Rifle, refers to the Colt AR as an "assault rifle" in a way that implies that would be a term understood by and familiar to his audience.
Literature I have in my possession provides evidence that the gun industry and associated media were pumping up the term in an attempt to build market interest and move some iron in the mid-'80s, prior to the Brady Bunch latching onto it as an alternative path forward that would likely be more productive for their cause than banning handguns.
I don't see how it benefits us in the long run to be either ignorant or less than honest about the history.