Page 13 of 15 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 146

Thread: Ed Harris--Revisiting the Full Charge Wadcutter

  1. #121
    Member Bruce in WV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Near D.C.
    A modern 1,000 fps/148gr DEWC load from the N340 online data page:

    Name:  B59AFF0E-3D9B-4AB6-81C8-7D85A4C04BEE.jpg
Views: 650
Size:  41.3 KB
    Yankee refugee living in the free state of West Virginia

  2. #122
    Lyman listed lots of high powered loads for wadcutters in 357 mag in most of their "Cast Bullet Handbook" and "Pistol and Revolver Handbook". 1400+ fps in some cases.

    Formidable.

  3. #123
    Member Bruce in WV's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Near D.C.
    I neglected to identify this as a 38 spl load table. Edited to correct that error.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bruce in WV View Post
    A modern 1,000 fps/148gr DEWC 38 spl load from the N340 online data page:

    Name:  B59AFF0E-3D9B-4AB6-81C8-7D85A4C04BEE.jpg
Views: 650
Size:  41.3 KB
    Yankee refugee living in the free state of West Virginia

  4. #124
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Is there any serious concern about using magnum primers with the smaller charges and reduced case capacity of wadcutter loads?

  5. #125
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    In the desert, looking for water.
    Quote Originally Posted by 03RN View Post
    Is there any serious concern about using magnum primers with the smaller charges and reduced case capacity of wadcutter loads?
    I don’t think so. Should run just fine. The magnum primer, iirc, has a harder cup to resist Magnum pressure loads, not some significantly different/more/hotter priming compound.

    I could be wrong, but that’s what I remember reading.

  6. #126
    Quote Originally Posted by 03RN View Post
    Is there any serious concern about using magnum primers with the smaller charges and reduced case capacity of wadcutter loads?
    Even with higher force from a mag primer, wadcutter load pressures are so low that increasing them a few percent still leaves you well below operating maximums.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  7. #127
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Im not so worried about pressure, more like erratic or poor performance.

  8. #128
    Quote Originally Posted by 03RN View Post
    Im not so worried about pressure, more like erratic or poor performance.
    Quite the opposite. Magnum primers are recommended for powders with poor ignition (famously 296/H110) or adverse conditions like extreme cold weather. The extra power is better at lighting off propellant.

    Serious match rifle shooters have discovered that the mildest primers that will light off the propellant consistently are best for accuracy. They avoid magnum primers and seek out certain brands for that reason. Unless you’re shooting bullseye at 50 yards it’s immaterial for handguns.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  9. #129
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Thanks

  10. #130
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Got some tested yesterday.

    4" M10-10
    3.5gr 231 under 148gr dewc
    725fps
    173ft lbs

    4gr 231 under 148gr dewc
    844fps
    234ft lbs

    3" M10-7
    3.5gr 231 under 148gr dewc
    704fps
    163ft lbs

    4gr 231 under 148gr dewc
    839fps
    231ft lbs

    Accuracy was better with the 4gr load in both and they were exceedingly mild.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •