In the aftermath of the last year or so I have been stunned by some of the commentary about Police and Police Actions using Deadly Force.
Just a sample-
- George Floyd was arrested over _JUST_ a fake 20 dollar bill.
- Adam Toledo (aka lil’homicide) was _JUST_ running away with his new gun and was 13 years old
- Daunte Wright was _JUST_ driving away until a cop mistook a taser for a gun
- Ma'Khia Bryant was _JUST_ in a fight with other teen girls, so she had a knife she is “just a kid"
I have been in Military related circles in the past. One of the things that always fascinates me is the lag between a massive change in legal and policy areas to the final implementation and understanding in battle (or the street if you will).
Above are examples of statements from I assume to be reasonable adults who don’t understand the reality that cops face every day. That reality is that big criminals do small crimes (like passing fake 20 bills) and you NEVER KNOW when a small crime is being perpetrated by a BIg Bad Dangerous Felon with a rap sheet a mile long.
For example the dear departed Ma’Khia was frolicing with her knife while her Dad (a seasoned Criminal with a LONG history) was egging her on. And when the cop shot her in the process of practicing her fish gutting skills on her new playmate… then said “she was only a kid”.
The summary is - Society NOW does not want cops using deadly force (that be shooting) of criminals. UNLESS it is OBVIOUS to poorly informed and coddled average american (who will end up on a poorly informed Jury) that there was NO CHOICE but to Shoot the Hell out of the Criminal.
Got That? I know I know. What about preventative policing? What about danger to society? What about danger to officers?
DOES NOT MATTER - read that again DOES NOT MATTER
( you can stop here if you don’t want the detailed discussion as to WHY it no longer matters)
Tennessee V Garner
The lingering impacts of Tennessee V. Garner the Criminal’s gift that just keeps giving.
Brief overview of case - Tennessee had a law - simple law - run from cops get shot.
Garner was the dad of one of these shot felons that died. Garner Dad wanted money, Tennessee said NO - Bad Son “should have known” run from cops get shot. Garner said NOT FAIR! And went to Federal Court looking for money.
This case bounced around the Federal Court System until it made it’s way to the Supreme Court of these here United States.
AND.. The infamous Warren Court put forth an edict.
Most Cops look at Tennessee V. Garner and think - OK I can’t shoot Fleeing Felons.
YEP… except THAT IS NOT ALL THAT IS IN THE OPINION
A certain Justice named White wrote the majority opinion. He TIED use of deadly force by armed officers as a SEIZURE which invokes 4th Amendment Protections.
(short explanation the Federal courts had been for sometime looking desperately for some means to curtail Police Deadly Force (stop them shooting Criminals). There is not a Right to Life in the Constitution so the Dear little Supremes “invented” a link between Police Use of Deadly Force and 4th amendment protections against Unlawful Seizures, cool huh? Wish I could invent reality like that)
And dear ol’ White did us one better too! He went back into English Common law and noticed that the reason why in ol’ England it was A OK to shoot fleeing suspects… was because nearly ALL Felonies in that time WERE a Death Sentence. So White (bless his shrunken heart) also made a PROPORTIONALITY argument or heuristic rule type idea into the calculus of WHEN it’s A OK to Shoot a Criminal. Got That?
Now from 1985 to 2020 I have no idea of the stops along the way. But it is CERTAIN that every Legal Type (Defense Counsel, Ambulance Chaser, Prosecutor) Knows the ruling very well was TAUGHT these nuances of the Tennessee V. Garner opinion for the last 30 years.
In the opinion the Cop use of Deadly Force is called the ULTIMATE SEIZURE. That is ANY SHOOTING (or death now) is under intense scrutiny for it’s possible 4th Amendment Violation
So I would say absent evidence of crimes that carry a death penalty or equivalent - that is Murder right in front of you. Use of deadly force should be reconsidered in light of legal realities. (By the way I am NOT advocating this in a tactical sense, just that officers should be aware)
What does this all mean?
Welp here’s a few hints -
Cops should probably should rethink felon stops now. If the predicate was something minor (traffic violation, jaywalking) etc and your Cop self is drawn into a deadly force incident… despite threat to you the cop, you the cop NOW have a Great Deal of legal exposure. Certainly Civil, Probably Criminal depending on circumstances (just saying)
Cops should probably rethink pursuit of criminals now. If the call was for something minor. Then consideration should be made for the potential of getting into a deadly force incident. Chicago has ended vehicle pursuit (according to Second City Cop) after the Adam Toledo/Lil’homicide incident there is rumor Chicago is ending foot pursuits.
I know this is a lot but when most of us on the pro-cop side don’t understand what planet the other side is on. It helps to go back into WHY anti-cop people think the way they do. MOST people are now of the opinion (as above) that a Cop should not arrest and be on top of a suspect for 9 minutes over a fake 20 dollar bill (yes they seriously fixate on the ORIGINAL REASON why the cop was there not what the cop sees AFTER he gets there). Anti-Cop People also look at cop shootings as being somewhat orchestrated by the cop. That is cop chases bad guy into a corner bad guy pulls weapon THEN the cop can shoot the bad guy. All of this was planned by the cop! (they say with straight face)
IF we pro-cop people realize that the other side of this REALLY REALLY believes that Criminals are precious life forces that dare not be killed except in instances that they really really are trying to murder someone. THEN I think pro-cop know the anti-cop people are delusional. But at least come to grips with what anti-cop thinking implies to operations.
But ITS REAL Folks! There is a reason WHY other human beings are SERIOUSLY saying that Ma'Khia Bryant should ONLY have been shot to death AFTER stabbing her victim not before.
Because AFTER Ma’Khia stabs that girl to death THEN Officer you can shoot her! The ultimate seizure is allowed after you see murder with your eyes of course!
Think about how sheltered your life must really be to think in a deadly force incident you have time to actually think that through. Frankly I think we should just let all the coddled people receive the full force of what their weak understanding of human criminality will reap.