TGS et al
What was attached was the motion for a new trial filed on June 2, 2021 to the trial court that heard the case, not an appeal to the appeals court. The trial judge would be the one deciding that motion. The same trial court that imposed a 21.5 year sentence on June 25, 2021. There is a file stamp on the upper right setting forth the date. The caption of the case makes it clearly known to which court the motion was being directed.
Historically, the likelihood of any trial judge undoing an entire jury verdict in a post trial motion pre sentencing when the defendant has an absolute right to appeal to a higher court is extremely low, particularly under the facts of this case.
https://www.npr.org/sections/trial-o...e-floyd-murder
Ponder this as you ponder Chauvin's ultimate culpability for some crime:
How many times have we seen videos where officers engage in gun battles with subjects and shoot them. Those subjects are secured and lifesaving first aid is then immediately rendered.
In this matter, no aid was rendered by any sworn LE at any time. The fact that no officer on scene ever rendered aid is problematic to a full acquittal under any circumstances in front of any court re Chauvin for sure. IMHO, personal as it it. YMMV.