Quote: "One night, while at dinner on Whiskey Row in Prescott, an enthusiastic discussion took place. We were in the midst of planning our own class gun . . . it was going to be a 100% revolver only class."
Continued at https://www.gunblast.com/MATT-Gunsite250R.htm
Damn.
Ken
BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”
Want!
Sweet. Wonder how much that was?
The shipping alone as it bounced around from gunsmith to gunsmith in Arizona, West Virginia and Texas probably added a fair bit to the price.Originally Posted by Duelist
Results look good but man. I don't get the need for having four different gunsmiths across three states do the work.
Oh.
Oh My.
I would happily carry such a thing for the rest of my days.
"If I ever needed to hunt in a tuxedo, then this would be the rifle I'd take." - okie john
"Not being able to govern events, I govern myself." - Michel De Montaigne
edit: Unless I guess they bought the sights from Novak only and had them installed at one of the other three gusmiths. On the first read that's not how it sounded to me, but IDK.
I’m in. That is just about perfect.
I may just retain the ‘smiths on my own and send along my 65-3 for the bead blast version of this!
”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB
That is a beautiful gun!
I would love to have something like that to carry daily.
Sweet. But, I would pass on the protruding gold bead, as that can cause my aim to be off, to one side or the other, if that bead is side-lighted. A flush-inset gold dot, line, or block, would be better. Tom Givens’ red paint, or another color, would suffice, quite well.
I do like the concept of a revolver-specific class.
Retar’d LE. Kinesthetic dufus.
Don’t tread on volcanos!
Reply With Quote
