LPVOs in 2023 and beyond

[Wake27]

I'm a current PLX-C owner. I have mixed feelings on the new Nova reticle.

It'll probably be a baller Razor-like 1x scope. But it's weakness is how tight and dark it gets above 7x. I'm not sure I'd want a SFP reticle with that scope since I don't particularly like to use it at max power.

I really wish they put a simpler and cleaner reticle in the FFP version

I'd agree, or keep it 1-6. 1-8 SFP always seemed a bit odd to me.

[joshs]

Leupold has a 1-4.5 in their new MK4HD line: https://www.leupold.com/mark-4hd-1-4...um-firedot-bdc

[Tokarev]

I'm a current PLX-C owner. I have mixed feelings on the new Nova reticle.

It'll probably be a baller Razor-like 1x scope. But it's weakness is how tight and dark it gets above 7x. I'm not sure I'd want a SFP reticle with that scope since I don't particularly like to use it at max power.

I really wish they put a simpler and cleaner reticle in the FFP version

I thought people generally liked the Nova reticle?

At just over 16 ounces and then 10 inches long this should be a good option for those wanting a daylight bright 1x and also something with more horsepower. Granted a 1-6 with the P series glass and similar size/weight specs would have been fine.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[Tokarev]

Leupold has a 1-4.5 in their new MK4HD line: https://www.leupold.com/mark-4hd-1-4...um-firedot-bdc

At post #1132 we start talking a bit about this new scope.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[littlejerry]

I thought people generally liked the Nova reticle?

At just over 16 ounces and then 10 inches long this should be a good option for those wanting a daylight bright 1x and also something with more horsepower. Granted a 1-6 with the P series glass and similar size/weight specs would have been fine.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

The Nova reticle itself is fine, I just don't think the PLX-C is a good candidate for SFP. I'd much rather see it as a 1-6x

[Tokarev]

The Nova reticle itself is fine, I just don't think the PLX-C is a good candidate for SFP. I'd much rather see it as a 1-6x

Initial SHOT reviews are, not surprisingly, quite good. The 1x imagine is supposed to be very flat and true. The illumination is bright.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[Wake27]

I'd agree, or keep it 1-6. 1-8 SFP always seemed a bit odd to me.

Initial SHOT reviews are, not surprisingly, quite good. The 1x imagine is supposed to be very flat and true. The illumination is bright.

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

I thought about this a little more and am curious what the price point will be, if different from the current offering. Having a 1-8 SFP feels weird to me but I think running 8x out of a 10x scope makes sense so obviously the same could be done with 6x on a 8x top end optic. The only reason I ditched the PLX 1-8 was because of the dimness and a little bit of the reticle being a bit overwhelming. The more I think about it, there’s a good chance I’ll get one of the 1-8 SFP Novas.

[littlejerry]

I thought about this a little more and am curious what the price point will be, if different from the current offering. Having a 1-8 SFP feels weird to me but I think running 8x out of a 10x scope makes sense so obviously the same could be done with 6x on a 8x top end optic. The only reason I ditched the PLX 1-8 was because of the dimness and a little bit of the reticle being a bit overwhelming. The more I think about it, there’s a good chance I’ll get one of the 1-8 SFP Novas.

I believe they said same price as current.

It'll be a great 1x optic. It'll be harder to use at distance with the tight eye box and reduced image quality at 8x. I generally only turn mine up to 6x unless I have a rock solid position and it's a bright sunny day.

[Tokarev]

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk

[Tokarev]

Sent from my SM-S901U using Tapatalk