dupe
dupe
Does the above offend? If you have paid to be here, you can click here to put it in context.
The Steiner diamond is designed to measure an 18" target at 200 meters across the center. There are vertical stadia lines at 2, 3 and 4 mil that also reference 18"Originally Posted by rob_s
Adjustments on the 5204 are noted as .1 mil per click. They are ½" on the 5202.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
I have been looking at one of these as the price point is closer to a PST II but the optic is made by LOW Japan, making the glass on par with a 1-6 Razor.
Who has personal experience with one?
-Seconds Count. Misses Don't-
I have one and I payed about it here a few pages back. I would recommend it highly. Basically imagine a Steiner px4 but it's a 1-6 and you'll know what to expect.
I missed that page
I've never seen the PX4 in the wild. Around here it seems like everyone is running Vortex, Leupold, or something cheap from China.
The two LPVOs that I am currently running are an old 1-4X Razor, which has been a great optic, and a Bushnell 1-8.5 SMRS. I like the look of the MIL reticle on the Stryker and was thinking of swapping the 1-4 Razor out.
-Seconds Count. Misses Don't-
I have a Delta Stryker 1-6 as well. I like the size and weight. Optically it is nice. Bright image. Maybe a little fuzzy at the very edges. Nothing a person would ever notice while actually using.I missed that page
I've never seen the PX4 in the wild. Around here it seems like everyone is running Vortex, Leupold, or something cheap from China.
The two LPVOs that I am currently running are an old 1-4X Razor, which has been a great optic, and a Bushnell 1-8.5 SMRS. I like the look of the MIL reticle on the Stryker and was thinking of swapping the 1-4 Razor out.
The reticle is the thing I like the least. In my opinion the mil dot format is wasted here. Delta needs something like the Leupold CMR2, SIG DWLR6 or SAI CX9001 here.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Thanks for the review.
So you don't shoot your AR to 1000 yards like the rest of us?
I have that similar BDC reticle in a Burris XTR II which is currently for sale. They work okay until you start doing some distance shooting. If you have a spotter trying to tell you where your hits and misses are, it's difficult for them to give you an exact measurement, say .5 mils left or 2 MOA right, etc. The spotter can give you some reference, like come up half a target, but it isn't easy.
Also, targets are typically not at set ranges. You could have targetts at 545, 680, and 790.
Maybe we should trade!
-Seconds Count. Misses Don't-
If you want a basic mil based reticle then the Stryker will appeal to you.Thanks for the review.
So you don't shoot your AR to 1000 yards like the rest of us?
I have that similar BDC reticle in a Burris XTR II which is currently for sale. They work okay until you start doing some distance shooting. If you have a spotter trying to tell you where your hits and misses are, it's difficult for them to give you an exact measurement, say .5 mils left or 2 MOA right, etc. The spotter can give you some reference, like come up half a target, but it isn't easy.
Also, targets are typically not at set ranges. You could have targetts at 545, 680, and 790.
Maybe we should trade!
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Here is another C_Does video for the Stryker.
https://youtu.be/rzef6cWBEh0
Watching this reminds me of another complaint I have with the Delta and scopes like it with the threaded receptacle for a throw lever. The lever sits at 9:00 and is easily snagged on gear. I'd prefer to have it more tucked away at about 8:00 or 9:00. Granted this may slow access a bit but I think a more protected location is important.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
7:00 or 8:00 is what I meant above.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Reply With Quote
