There have been several first hand reports from members here that the eyebox of the Razor Gen III 1-10x is not as generous as that of the previous Gen II 1-6x. How do those experiences align with the results that this gentleman achieves? His approach is at least somewhat methodical and analytic, and he seems to get different results!?
Some comparative efforts for some of the more expensive options on the market:
After watching that last video, I like my Accupower 1-4’s even more.
FFP scopes and illuminated reticles just don’t impress me on low power and I don’t need daylight bright on high power. I love my FFP 3-9 SWFA for ranging at any magnification but if I’m trying to use a LPVO as a red dot, I want to see a bright red dot, Maybe it gets lost in the camera but I didn’t see anything Aimpoint bright on low power.
Thanks for the videos, I don’t think I’m as deprived as the internet chatter says I am with my Accupowers.
The illumination definitely doesn't come through in video. The LED + fiber illuminated wire reticles (P4Xi, some Credo 1-6 SFP models, Razor 1-6, PSTII 1-6, Delta Stryker 1-6) create an Aimpoint bright dot. The NX8 had a crazy bright center and uses different tech to achieve it.
I'm not someone who thinks daylight bright reticles are a requirement, but I don't deny they have a real benefit.
Another LPVO review from C_Does:
https://youtu.be/KbjhyAKJKf0
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk