If you have or have used an NX8 the 6x or 8x was close to that, not unusable but not easy. The 9x to 10x was difficult to the point of not being worth the effort.
You could probably find a way to only use the 6 or 8x on it but as I said I started asking myself, why train around it when it cost more and is heavier than what I already have where I don't need to do that?
If you need that 9x or 10x because you are using it on a gun that can reach out to 1000 yards like 6.5 creedmore it's the best option available. If you are shooting 5.56 out of a 16 in barrel at a max of 500 yards it's a trade off of extra cost, extra weight, and extra training to get that extra magnification range you aren't likely to ever need; stick with their Razor Gen 2 1-6 or if you care about weight Delta Stryker 1-6, Nightforce NX8 1-8, Trijicon Credo HX 1-6, etc.
That said as they point out in the video if you want that extra mag because you are a DMR roles, in military, or a hunter and you need it for target identification it might be just what you need. I don't do any of those things so for me it was a waste.
I guess my point is it's not a bad scope at all but it's clearly meant for a role different than their Gen2 1-6 and it doesn't replace their Gen 2 1-6 the way everyone was hoping it would and every time I see a youtube review where they don't mention that makes me question their honesty. (I.E. they are praising it for the clicks.) That InRange review is the most honest and accurate version I've seen of that scope.