Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 18

Thread: CA Lawmakers Want Sheriffs with No Police Experience

  1. #1
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    The Keystone State

    CA Lawmakers Want Sheriffs with No Police Experience

    Ca. and especially San Francisco County, just continue to sink into the abyss. I would change one word in Sen. Wiener's 'analysis'. In the last sentence, substitute "QUALIFIED" for "ELIGIBLE."




    https://www.policemag.com/593433/ca-...ice-experience
    Last edited by 11B10; 02-04-2021 at 09:00 AM.
    "We are the domestic pets of a human zoo we call civilization."

    Laurence Gonzales - "Deep Survival."

  2. #2
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Lexington, SC
    Quote Originally Posted by 11B10 View Post
    Ca. and especially San Francisco County, just continue to sink into the abyss. I would change one word in Sen. Wiener's 'analysis'. In the last sentence, substitute "QUALIFIED" for "ELIGIBLE."




    https://www.policemag.com/593433/ca-...ice-experience
    That should work out well...

  3. #3
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    I suspect the California legislature will happily pass this legislation...and then have apoplexy when a Proud Boy or just some conservative Republican runs for sheriff somewhere in the state.

  4. #4
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    I was about to post an Idiocracy meme but I see that we're in the LE forum, so, I'll just agree that this is a monumentally stupid idea.

    I wonder what percentage of California land area is under the primary jurisdiction of a Sheriffs Department, vs. some other city/municipal LE.?
    "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

  5. #5
    Member jd950's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    In the flyover zone
    Is it pronounced "weener" or "whiner" ? Just curious.

    Anyone know which one in the picture is the Senator?
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #6
    Member Zincwarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Central Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by 11B10 View Post
    Ca. and especially San Francisco County, just continue to sink into the abyss. I would change one word in Sen. Wiener's 'analysis'. In the last sentence, substitute "QUALIFIED" for "ELIGIBLE."




    https://www.policemag.com/593433/ca-...ice-experience
    This is for the elected position yes?
    Just a note: Texas
    https://www.county.org/About-Texas-C...County-Sheriff
    County Sheriff Qualifications8

    The County Sheriff must meet the following qualifications at the time of appointment or election:

    U.S. Citizen
    Resident of Texas for at least 12 consecutive months
    Resident of the county for at least six consecutive months
    Registered to vote in the county
    At least 18 years of age
    Not have been finally convicted of a felony from which they have not been pardoned or otherwise released from the resulting disabilities
    Not have been determined by a court with probate jurisdiction to be totally mentally incapacitated or partially mentally incapacitated without the right to vote

    Candidates for this office generally must meet the above qualifications at the time of filing.

  7. #7
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Away, away, away, down.......
    Yeah, I don’t think this is an uncommon thing, and it’s only been a law in CA for thirty years. LE experience isn’t required to run for Sheriff in AL either.it will be interesting to watch, but the sky may just no be falling.
    im strong, i can run faster than train

  8. #8
    Totally agree, the sky ain't falling, in our state the Sheriff still has to come through the Academy if he/she isn't certified already.

    Why would you want it any other way for an elected office?

  9. #9
    Member TGS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Back in northern Virginia
    I'm going to danger that most of the state constitutions/laws on the books that don't require police experience or police training/academy/certification to run for Sheriff are holdovers from the old days when such things such as academies and training didn't really exist, and Sheriffs were non-professional jobs (many times even a side job). As LE become more professional and civil rights more intricate, it likely wasn't a hot topic on the books for many states since Sheriffs are typically a political job leading an organization, and not necessarily running the street where such inexperience would rear its ugly head in a dramatically comedic, quick manner due to 4th Amendment violations.

    Many "street" positions used to be the same way. Some still are. It wasn't until 2014 or so when Vermont finally got around to requiring any police training to serve as a Constable, which are full fledged LEOs. Certainly not a common thing these days, I'm just mentioning it to build context. Remember, the first police academy in the US was founded in 1908, and most of the US didn't use police academies or require such until well after WWII.

    So, I think these situations are quite a bit different than what's going on in California, where the end-state is clearly to insert non-LE "woke" types into the role for the nearly express intent of LE reform.
    Last edited by TGS; 02-04-2021 at 04:19 PM.
    "Are you ready? Okay. Let's roll."- Last words of Todd Beamer

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Living across the Golden Bridge , and through the Rainbow Tunnel, somewhere north of Fantasyland.
    Quote Originally Posted by TGS View Post
    I'm going to danger that most of the state constitutions/laws on the books that don't require police experience or police training/academy/certification to run for Sheriff are holdovers from the old days when such things such as academies and training didn't really exist, and Sheriffs were non-professional jobs (many times even a side job). As LE become more professional and civil rights more intricate, it likely wasn't a hot topic on the books for many states since Sheriffs are typically a political job leading an organization, and not necessarily running the street where such inexperience would rear its ugly head in a dramatically comedic, quick manner due to 4th Amendment violations.

    Many "street" positions used to be the same way. Some still are. It wasn't until 2014 or so when Vermont finally got around to requiring any police training to serve as a Constable, which are full fledged LEOs. Certainly not a common thing these days, I'm just mentioning it to build context. Remember, the first police academy in the US was founded in 1908, and most of the US didn't use police academies or require such until well after WWII.

    So, I think these situations are quite a bit different than what's going on in California, where the end-state is clearly to insert non-LE "woke" types into the role for the nearly express intent of LE reform.
    This is 100% correct. As referenced in the article linked in the OP, the law as passed in 1989 to require LE experience and certification was called the "Hennessy Rule", in response to the SF Sheriff, Mike Hennessy. He was a prisoner rights advocate who figured out he could do more for prisoners by becoming sheriff. He referred to his deputies as his "Program Staff", and employed a convicted murderer as Under Sheriff for years. The law was changed to prevent that happening again.....and reversing it is clearly with the intent of electing Scott Weiners political allies in every county in the state. They will OVERTLY politicize law enforcement in every way imaginable.

    As a side note, strangely enough, Mike Hennessy was an avid shooter. And once when his deputies interrupted a robbery, and the suspect pulled a knife and was subsequently ventilated, Mike Hennessy told the press, "Pull a knife on my deputies, you're gonna get shot. If you get shot, you're probably gonna die."

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •