Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: New Production Class 509?

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by rob_s View Post
    I only really care about what other plastic gun makers do because it’s the only thing that keeps Glock inching forward.
    Honestly, I think Glock losing the Army contract was the best thing for us as consumers. Glock finally made the 43x and 48.
    #RESIST

  2. #22
    Site Supporter Trukinjp13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Michigan

    New Production Class 509?

    I like it. Keep making tweaks and new models. Invest in your product FN. I would prefer that grip texture make it to all models. Then you only have two types.

    Also, this should give us 509 owners a factory flat trigger option to buy.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  3. #23
    As long as it also improves on the 509 trigger it should be good to go. That’s my only issue with the 509, the stock trigger is absolute garbage.
    “Conspiracy theories are just spoiler alerts these days.”

  4. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    They are proud of it — MSRP $1,499.
    Does potentially make it a very hard sell. Interestingly, I've also heard very vague rumors, but from folks that are certainly in the know, that there will be yet another 509 release later this year that will be even better than this model (though I have no idea what was meant by "better").

  5. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Northwest
    Glock Killer
    A71593

  6. #26
    Well, their timing could be OK. In the past we would have said to buy a Glock 34 and 5,000 rounds of ammo. Now we would have to say to buy a Glock and 1,000 rounds of ammo, so by that measure the new 509 looks better.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  7. #27
    Site Supporter JodyH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    New Mexico
    How long until FN drops the 509 and brings out the 1509 that takes a completely different magazine, internals and holster?
    Then completely drops all support for the 509.
    Like they've done with every other pistol they've ever released.

    That's why nothing FN makes (except Lego AR's) interests me.
    "For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
    -- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --

  8. #28
    Site Supporter Kanye Wyoming's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    A little too close to New Jersey

    Confessions of a P-F Heretic

    About 2 years ago give or take I traded in a gun I had no use for any longer in exchange for an FN 509 midsize (509M). I liked it. Not as much as the VP9 or VP9SK or Shadow Systems MR918, but I liked it. It felt really good. Typically I didn’t do quite as well with it on drills as with the VP9 or MR918, but pretty close. Even though my best results with the VP9 tended to be a little better than my 509M bests, over time it became apparent that I shot more consistently with the 509M. It concealed IWB with a tucked in shirt very well, much better than its size would suggest, and didn't jab me or poke me anywhere whether sitting or standing. Must have something to do with the shape. There was no ammo you could get it to choke on. With Talon Pros on, the grip texture was just right. Objectively speaking the trigger kinda sucks, particularly compared to the VP9, but for some reason it works well for me.

    I then picked up the optics ready model and a few months ago put a Holosun 507C on. Around the same time I also had the VP9 milled and a 507C installed. What I now shoot most often are the 509M with optic and VP9 with the same optic. Damned if I don’t leave every range session thinking WTF, how can this be, this 509M just shoots so flat and effortlessly and consistently, and I feel more confident with it than even the VP9.

    I’ve occasionally been tempted to get the Apex trigger that a lot of people rave about, but then each time I shoot it I feel like even if the Apex is “better,” maybe I’m better suited to a mediocre trigger for some reason, or at least this mediocre trigger. Although I do think it has gotten better over time.

    Along the way I saw some YouTube videos about how the 509M locks up if immersed in water, and that was concerning. Then again, I don’t own a boat, if I did own a boat it would be in New Jersey or Maryland where I wouldn’t be able to have a gun with me anyway, when I hike it is rarely near water that I am likely to find myself in, and to the extent I ever had any Navy Seal aspirations, the Seals are probably not quite so desperate as to need stout 58-year-olds.

    There was also an issue with the strikers having a tendency to break, which was much more concerning. Apex then came along with a heavy duty machined striker, so I got two of those and installed them.

    Except for those occasions when carrying something smaller and more invisible is imperative, the 509M has evolved into the gun I have on me every waking hour.

    There I said it. Come at me, bitches.

  9. #29
    Is FN still offering the flexible frame feature?


  10. #30
    Site Supporter Trukinjp13's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Michigan
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    Is FN still offering the flexible frame feature?

    [emoji2359] different gun.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •