At this point, it might be easier to describe who this optic will not appeal to, then who it will appeal to. I predict a narrow target market.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.
Semper Paratus,
Steve
There are a lot of products that PF does not like that make the firearms manufacturers a lot of money.
The test for me would be if it provides a rugged, reliable sighting system that provides quantifiably superior results to iron sights. If so, I'd be willing to try it. The next question will be how well the relatively small aperture/screen performs compared to both iron sights and larger RDS.
At this point, I'm pretty open minded regarding it, and can see trying it on one of my Gen 3 Glocks.
Once some of our members have empirically tested it, I'll be very interested to read their reports. Right now, most everyone seems to be criticizing before testing.
Best, Jon
I don’t know. I think I like the idea, but the execution for a concealment gun is lacking IMO. For me, the things the print when carrying AIWB are the rear sight and end of the grip. This design seems to accentuate the rear sight/end of slide. Aside from maybe just breaking up the outline enough to cause confusion fusion, this may print badly. Maybe a gen 2 device with the battery compartment better laid out..
In the end, if it works and offers the ability to stay target focused like “traditional” RDS it will be good for those who don’t do the whole AIWB thing.
https://www.instagram.com/tv/CJn7Osl...d=eqdao0x4v0bm
I figured it wouldn’t be long coming. He seems to like it.
“Remember, being healthy is basically just dying as slowly as possible,” Ricky Gervais