Originally Posted by
runcible
BBI,
Pardon, that was glib of me; and that wasn't my attention.
Re: Youtubing "james lindel retention;" which I now understand to be a misspelling of Lindell's name, includes on the first page such titles as "Semen Retention Pt.2 - Your Questions Answered," "The rewards of retention |SEMEN RETENTION|," "Retain to obtain ultimate confidence |seed retention|," and "Semen Retention | Your Seed Has Great Power" and frankly, those just weren't the firearms retention demonstrations that I was seeking.
On the sub-forum remark, I had the simultaneous thoughts that forced-battery shooting techniques probably would be best suited for the Unarmed sub-forum despite the obligate presence of a firearm, and that this all might be a bit more light-hearted than that, given the nature of the videos. I think the harder one stares at the concept, the more it becomes problematic as a singleton technique; and the more that it becomes a technique most viable within a team context. Then: the more teammates present and participating, the more that it becomes less desirable, given backstop issues. All of these concerns become trebled when the technique requires two hands in order to perform it (e.g. exposed hammer-fired system, Gadged SCD installed). Given the proximity to the opponent that would justify and\or necessitate such a technique - or other techniques - by obligation timing\relative-positioning\relative-control become greater priorities than speed, and that really pulls everything away from what's driven by the shot timer.
On shooting dual guns vs shooting a single gun; the OP demonstrated competent speed, precision, and accuracy in his other videos - above-baseline, at that. From 1:11 to 1:15 - the only 4 seconds of live fire in a 1:33 length video; it is clearly observable that the shooter's shoulders have reverted to the slightly off-square orientation (relative to the target) of their two-handed shooting stance, and under recoil the rearmost\right-side gun's muzzleline is near to or intersecting with the leading\left-side gun - far closer to intersecting with the left-hand (as per video) than is advisible. ~20 rd in 4 seconds, already at full-extension, close enough to the target for the muzzle blast to ruffle the paper, without needing to draw from the holster, and with a single transition between proximal targets ~4' apart? Getting all of those rounds out during that time may be challenging; but those that are fired are far more likely to be desirable hits than not; I expect that the OP could accomplish it within that time-limit.
Also... LOL @ "entangled."
JCN,
I think that "good enough" accuracy, sufficient to eventually and\or partially strike one's opponent; pales against the standard of "unlikely to miss (or shoot-through)," which is somewhat more self-descriptive and perhaps more considerate of bystanders and other participants. Some opinions may differ.
I have some familiarity with the 10mm and its descendant calibers; I don't think that its usage fundamentally changes the argument offered in any way for or against. I don't think that shooting one's self in the thumb or hand is hugely improved or worsened as a consideration; when considering .22LR, 9mm, or 10mm; if it's an avoidable activity altogether. Even as something that is not a certainty, but bears with it an increased likelihood of occurrence; as with running a cheapo foregrip on a KSG, I just can't get behind it. Other opinions, and digits, may differ; and the google image searches inform accordingly.