Originally Posted by t1tan
Don't be fooled. Made a meme to capture my feelings on this "surrender"
If only we could get rid of the ATF by blasting some sweet Jackie Wilson tunes.
Don't be fooled. Made a meme to capture my feelings on this "surrender"
If only we could get rid of the ATF by blasting some sweet Jackie Wilson tunes.
im strong, i can run faster than train
Tell that to bump stocks...
More then likely they realized they screwed something up in the announcement. Like a 14 day comment period instead of 90 like they were supposed to.
We could isolate Russia totally from the world and maybe they could apply for membership after 2000 years.
Bump stocks are not a 1:1 comparison.
What does "pending further Department of Justice review" mean?
Upon further consultation with the Department of Justice and the Office of theDeputy Attorney General, ATF is withdrawing, pending further Department of Justicereview
Doesn't read posts longer than two paragraphs.
When was there an EO on bump stocks? ATF created a new rule through the APA process. You may not think that rule is consistent with the statute (I don't), but it wasn't an EO
If you are familiar with American football, there is a play often conducted on fourth down that best explains that statement.
Here's the clearest version of the letter I could find with a reasonable amount of Googling. (embedded in NRA's Twitter feed)
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ep8BuTRW...name=4096x4096
Also found this page, which is interesting. I think I might have heard about it, but it sounded like some standard posturing from policritters at the time. In hindsight, perhaps it's what precipitated the "guidance," although the guidance failed to address any of the issues for which BATFE was specifically criticized in the Senators' letter:
https://www.cruz.senate.gov/?p=press_release&id=5479
https://www.cruz.senate.gov/files/do...J%20Letter.pdf
.
-----------------------------------------
Not another dime.
If/when ATF decides to begin formal rule making on pistol braces, DO NOT bring up bump stocks when submitting comments. There is absolutely no valid comparison between the two devices. Bringing up bump stocks is exactly how to ensure that your comments will not be taken seriously and will not be persuasive to those making the decisions.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Any legal information I may post is general information, and is not legal advice. Such information may or may not apply to your specific situation. I am not your attorney unless an attorney-client relationship is separately and privately established.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/w...of-popular-gun
Some 90 House members, moving with unusual speed, called this week on the Trump administration’s gun regulators to back off banning one of the most popular firearms used by sports men and women and disabled veterans.
In a letter organized by North Carolina Rep. Richard Hudson and signed by 89 others, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives was urged to withdraw new guidance on AR-15-style pistols.
Sorta around sometimes for some of your shitty mod needs.
Reply With Quote