Page 24 of 27 FirstFirst ... 142223242526 ... LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 263

Thread: RO Fatally Shot at NY USPSA Match

  1. #231
    Chasing the Horizon RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Central FL
    Quote Originally Posted by Bergeron View Post

    I'm down for changing safety rules as result of real-world outcomes, and I have worked a number of professional jobs with safety rules written quite literally in blood, but I don't see what can realistically be done or changed to USPSA that would be able to address this particular incident. I shoot at local indoor club that hosts weekly matches, with mostly CO or Production shooters, so this more than academic to me.
    I dunno, to be honest. Stop matches for a brief period and have clubs conduct a review of the rules we have in place now? Just spit balling.

    I’m also familiar with safety as a professional. I was involved in an ASW weapon system in the UK in the 90s, based on the EH101 platform. During flight testing, one of our pre-Prod helo’s spiraled into a mountain. We lost the Italian Chief Engineer for Augusta, the test pilot, and two Royal Navy crew members. That day sucked.

    We learned later that the (new design) rotor brake had apparently engaged in flight, heating up the (new design) carbon-fiber control rods. They melted. At that point they were passengers. We were grounded 18 months while the team came up with a solution (we reverted back to steel control rods, iirc.)

    I hope that USPSA takes the opportunity to review everything in the rule book, stem to stern, so we can determine if any changes do in fact need to be made to lessen the risk of this happening ever again.

  2. #232
    Chasing the Horizon RJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Central FL
    Quote Originally Posted by Eyesquared View Post
    Given their past track record, I think the organization's reaction will be to not react at all.
    Well, if they do, good luck surviving the $5M wrongful death lawsuit.

  3. #233
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Louisiana
    Quote Originally Posted by Clusterfrack View Post
    Allow Production and CO guns to start with hammer on decock notch. This is what I’ve been doing, unless told otherwise.
    Allow or mandate start on deock notch? I agree that this is safer, and have no problems with it. What about hammer guns without decock/half-cock notches?
    Per the PF Code of Conduct, I have a commercial interest in the StreakTM product as sold by Ammo, Inc.

  4. #234
    Site Supporter farscott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Dunedin, FL, USA
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Most rifles and shotguns are not drop safe. Firing pin blocks on handguns didn’t really become a thing until the 70s and 80s. This was one of the things that drove the dominance of double action revolver’s in law-enforcement for so long.
    S&W added the drop safety feature to hand ejector revolvers after a dropped revolver on a ship caused a fatality in the early 1940s. I believe Colt added the "Positive Lock" feature that accomplished the same thing decades earlier.

  5. #235
    Deadeye Dick Clusterfrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ...Employed?

    RO Fatally Shot at NY USPSA Match

    Quote Originally Posted by Bergeron View Post
    Allow or mandate start on deock notch? I agree that this is safer, and have no problems with it. What about hammer guns without decock/half-cock notches?
    I don’t have a good answer. At this point, I would say “recommend”?
    “There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
    "You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie

  6. #236
    Rule change?
    OK, no manual decocking, period. Your CZ (if not a D model) is in Limited only.
    Code Name: JET STREAM

  7. #237
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    Rule change?
    OK, no manual decocking, period. Your CZ (if not a D model) is in Limited only.
    Sure, let’s make the most popular guns used in production no longer viable.

  8. #238
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    In the desert, looking for water.
    Quote Originally Posted by farscott View Post
    S&W added the drop safety feature to hand ejector revolvers after a dropped revolver on a ship caused a fatality in the early 1940s. I believe Colt added the "Positive Lock" feature that accomplished the same thing decades earlier.
    S&W had a drop safe design prior to that unfortunate sailor’s death. It wasn’t good enough to keep that revolver from firing when dropped to the deck from the extended height (IIRC) it unfortunately launched from. They improved the design significantly.

  9. #239
    Deadeye Dick Clusterfrack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    ...Employed?
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    Rule change?
    OK, no manual decocking, period. Your CZ (if not a D model) is in Limited only.
    Manual decocking isn't a problem.
    “There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
    "You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie

  10. #240
    Quote Originally Posted by Bucky View Post
    Sure, let’s make the most popular guns used in production no longer viable.
    As the owner of a .45 revolver, my sympathy is limited.
    Code Name: JET STREAM

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •