So I recently decided to take my shooting to a level above casual plinking in effort to garner some practical proficiency. I have no aims to be a tactical BAMF or an incredibly high speed competitor necessarily, just measurable, definable performance benchmarks that I’d like to progress through for now. I have relatively little experience with pistols that can be considered “serious use” or service pistols, but I have had a good chance behind a lot of the more popular options (few hundred through a Gen 4 g22, XD45, M&P9, and just under 700 rounds through a P30L V3), and I have tried to sift through more than my fair share of internet for legitimate info on top of my time spent manipulating most makes at the LGS and picking the brains of the few seemingly apt shooters locally.
At this point I own a G17 RTF2 that I got as new old stock for quite a bargain, but before I procure the necessary mags/carriers and holster in prep for classes and range work I wanted to reassure myself against the nagging disdain for the recent era ejection/extraction debacle, especially in the face of my predilection for the P30 series and the P226 line. Currently the cost in terms of switching platforms at this stage would not hinder my time on range or other resources as my available time is the main throttle there. Would it be just an unwise move if I were to step out of the Glock, turn it for more than I have in it, knowing the step up may include a more complicated to breakdown/service platform, less availability, and a larger learning curve on the trigger side of the house? None of those attributes in particular worries me, as I am confident I could handle it, but I still can’t help but thinking “Why make it any less simple?”
Part of me is inclined to think I would be more likely to push myself with a platform I enjoy on a non efficiency-based level, and I wonder if there is something to be gained by learning a more complex platform as a whole that could translate into an easier time utilizing and maintaining any other pistol I may later move to. The other part believes the simplicity, ubiquity, and aftermarket support of the Glock should overshadow any other platforms’ perceived benefits as well as the preference of others' ergonomics and handling (and definitely outweighs the “cool” factor some pistols carry to me);especially given that my particular example of G17seems to have just dodged the recent production woes some have experienced by virtue of its age.
Thanks in advance for any input, and for accommodating my overly complicated take on a simple problem (I am well beyond Analysis Paralysis here).
-Sriggs