Pennsylvania Judge Orders Segregated Ballots Should be Tossed — Crooked PA Secretary of State “Lacked Statutory Authority” to Override Election Law
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...-election-law/
Point of order: biden is NOT president-elect yet; the EC has not voted. If it comes to the EC not being able to vote, then the House has not voted. Until either of those has occurred, biden is not and will remain not president-elect. As such no he should not be read in on anything.
You can be dismissive and try and paint a "Biden" mindset but you would be wrong and its interesting you ignore the other points and only focus on the flag. There is a point where it becomes a preponderance of evidence. But I didnt represent it as evidence. I represented it as observations that raise my concerns. I guarantee that at some point, and hopefully soon, that those dudes that can detect even minute fraud and cheating through mathematical analysis will shed some light. That and I expect a few smoking guns to drop. But you go ahead and embrace your new Comrade that will insure corruption and self enrichment remain the norm in the swamp you embrace.
I expect we will find some irregularities, as people are motivated to look very closely and there's lots of money being offered to try to find something, anything.
But people doing statistics on twitter are not the people actually doing the looking; they're largely amateurs on twitter who are largely doing this sort of statistical analysis for the first time, counting on nobody to check their work. There's a reason they're doing it on twitter, where everyone pretends to be an expert on everything.
Everyone understands that the EC has not voted, but it is customary for the outgoing administration to read in the incoming president on national security issues. This has been precedent for most of our history, and elected Republicans are starting to turn on Trump on this.
Mike Dewine, Republican governor of Ohio, just called Biden "President-elect." It is largely semantics, but there is no doubt that he should be read in on national security issues since he will be leading the nation in 70ish days.
Typical of the Lib Dems, your getting ahead of yourself and think by just claiming he is pres elect makes it so. The rush just underlines the reality that there is a palpable uncertainty and a likelihood evidence will become available to overturn the perceived outcome.
Nmmmm
Last edited by Kirk; 11-12-2020 at 04:17 PM.
I'm not a "Lib Dem." Ive voted Republican my entire life and will again if they become a serious party with serious people. I also live in reality and realize that there is approximately a 0% chance of anything being overturned, just as Karl Rove wrote in his op-ed yesterday in the WSJ.