Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 1234513 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 135

Thread: Feds Bust Militia Plot to Kidnap Whitmer

  1. #21
    Member MVS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    MI
    Quote Originally Posted by critter View Post
    pandemic restrictions isn't the hill I'm willing to kill commies on...
    Me either, but you might be amazed at the number of people here who talk like they would be.

  2. #22
    Student
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Arizona
    https://www.thedailybeast.com/read-t...etchen-whitmer

    Here's a link to the criminal complaint. It's about fifteen pages.

  3. #23
    Apparently they were trying to liberate Michigan.

  4. #24
    Abducted by Aliens Borderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Camano Island WA.
    Quote Originally Posted by MVS View Post
    Me either, but you might be amazed at the number of people here who talk like they would be.
    Some people here were quit vocal about the restrictions but I don't think anyone said anything about violent acts against the state.

    These idiots were all prison bound anyway. Not your sharpest tools in the shed posting that crap on social media.
    In the P-F basket of deplorables.

  5. #25
    Site Supporter 0ddl0t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Jefferson
    Just curious, did these guys come up with the plan to kidnap whitmer on their own or is this another case of an undercover FBI agent/informant coming up with an idea & encouraging suggestible idiots to cross a line they might never have otherwise crossed (e.g. https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...e-hook-244905/ )?
    Last edited by 0ddl0t; 10-08-2020 at 10:12 PM.

  6. #26
    banana republican blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mtns
    Quote Originally Posted by 0ddl0t View Post
    Just curious, did these guys come up with the plan to kidnap whitmer on their own or is this another case of an undercover FBI agent/informant coming up with an idea & encouraging suggestible idiots to cross a line they might never have otherwise crossed (e.g. https://www.rollingstone.com/politic...e-hook-244905/ )?
    Haven't read the link but in such cases, the defense would have a lot to work with.

    (I have been in this very situation while working undercover in years past. There's a fine line and one has to avoid what is considered entrapment and "outrageous conduct" by the government.)
    There's nothing civil about this war.

  7. #27
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by Yung View Post
    Looks like anarchists.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zincwarrior View Post
    Get real. That's militia terrorist pussies.
    They look like anarchists because they are anarchists, extremist libertarian anarchists, but anarchists nonetheless.

    Sone of y’all need to let go of your baggage and preconceived notions of extremist ideology in 2020.

    Anarchist does not necessarily equal Left or ANTIFA. Like other accelerationist ideologies it is not the exclusive Provence of the left or the right.

    Where have we seen right wing capitalist / libertarian anarchists before .....

    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....galoo-Movement

  8. #28
    Everyone has their line in the sand.

    There has to be something unconstitutional you can imagine your local governor doing where you might not be willing to join a militia to fight against the government, but when you read about other people doing it, you smile and say “good” at least some people have the balls.

    Are the lockdowns constitutional at a state level? Depends on the state and so far most challenges either resulted in a judicial outcome of “no, they are not” or “doesn’t matter, let’s give the governor leeway and we can decide the arbitrariness of shutting down business X but not business Y later and maybe in a few years we’ll admit they were unconstitutional and shrug”

    Personally, I’m not in a militia, I won’t join a militia, but if they keep governments in check, if maybe a governor thinks “if I cross the line too far here, enough people will take up arms and pitchforks and my taxpayer funded detail won’t be able to protect me.” And if that results in fewer unconstitutional bullshit being passed, then to me that sounds like the intention of the second amendment.

    Not only to be able to perform an armed revolution but also to change behavior of politicians through fear of one occurring. The first level of the use of force matrix for PD is presence. Perhaps the presence of armed militias might be enough to deter some unconstitutional bullshit.

    Personally, I hate masks, and I hate the shutdowns but not enough to throw my life away to fight against the government. Heck, it doesn’t bother me enough even to make a a sign and go stand outside in peaceful protest.

    I’ll never support these militias but when I hear about someone actually fighting for freedom, it’s hard not to smile.

  9. #29
    Site Supporter 0ddl0t's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Jefferson
    Quote Originally Posted by Sanch View Post
    Everyone has their line in the sand.

    There has to be something unconstitutional you can imagine your local governor doing where you might not be willing to join a militia to fight against the government, but when you read about other people doing it, you smile and say “good” at least some people have the balls.

    Are the lockdowns constitutional at a state level? Depends on the state and so far most challenges either resulted in a judicial outcome of “no, they are not” or “doesn’t matter, let’s give the governor leeway and we can decide the arbitrariness of shutting down business X but not business Y later and maybe in a few years we’ll admit they were unconstitutional and shrug”

    Personally, I’m not in a militia, I won’t join a militia, but if they keep governments in check, if maybe a governor thinks “if I cross the line too far here, enough people will take up arms and pitchforks and my taxpayer funded detail won’t be able to protect me.” And if that results in fewer unconstitutional bullshit being passed, then to me that sounds like the intention of the second amendment.

    Not only to be able to perform an armed revolution but also to change behavior of politicians through fear of one occurring. The first level of the use of force matrix for PD is presence. Perhaps the presence of armed militias might be enough to deter some unconstitutional bullshit.

    Personally, I hate masks, and I hate the shutdowns but not enough to throw my life away to fight against the government. Heck, it doesn’t bother me enough even to make a a sign and go stand outside in peaceful protest.

    I’ll never support these militias but when I hear about someone actually fighting for freedom, it’s hard not to smile.
    Seems to me that these patriots skipped a few steps towards redress before jumping into revolution...

  10. #30
    Four String Fumbler Joe in PNG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Papua New Guinea; formerly Florida
    It's Blair's Law in action. Once a group crosses a certain radical event horizon, they become pretty much indistinguishable from other radical groups.
    "You win 100% of the fights you avoid. If you're not there when it happens, you don't lose." - William Aprill
    "I've owned a guitar for 31 years and that sure hasn't made me a musician, let alone an expert. It's made me a guy who owns a guitar."- BBI

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •