Quote Originally Posted by maximus83 View Post
That Sig could release that rifle in that condition is outrageous. Hard to think what's worse: either they knew about the potential issue and unethically rushed it to market anyway without even basic testing, or they didn't know and were just mind-blowingly incompetent.
The cost of bringing all of the rifles back, fixing them, and sending them back out will by itself eat up significant margin. There is no company, responsibly run or not, that would deliberately put out a product with that magnitude of known issue.

With that said, the Cross buyers are yet another set of SIG beta testers, and that is abhorrent.