I’d love to get away with spending $100 but I do t want a tube optic on a pistol.Originally Posted by Lon
I’d love to get away with spending $100 but I do t want a tube optic on a pistol.
Does the above offend? If you have paid to be here, you can click here to put it in context.
Id probably do the pic rail mount. My pistol already has a rail so it seems the least fiddle-fart option.
Does the above offend? If you have paid to be here, you can click here to put it in context.
I have this and it seems to work well.
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
I had an early AimPoint on my MkIII CTM for about a decade when it was new, and it wasn’t much fun. I find open emitter sights to work much better for me.
Ken
BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”
Kinda tempted to try out this guy...
https://www.swampfoxoptics.com/kingslayer
Does the above offend? If you have paid to be here, you can click here to put it in context.
Been happy with this mount and vortex venom on my suppressed Mk4
About 20k rounds on the combo
https://lobos-industries.com/product...-profile-mount
What's the reasoning behind the extra spend on a new mount vs just attaching to the factory rail? Getting the optic lower on the bore?
ETA:
also curious which dot option you have.
Does the above offend? If you have paid to be here, you can click here to put it in context.
Yes. The factory pic rail was tall as shit.
I have the 3 MOA venom.
What mount and RDS is that?I have this and it seems to work well.
Sent from my SM-G892A using Tapatalk
Chris
It is the legit Aimpoint when they made them in silver and their mount. They still show the mount on their www site but most suppliers seem to show them as discontinued:
https://www.aimpoint.com/product/aim...t-ruger-mkiii/
Midway sold a bunch of them for like $350 on closeout.
Reply With Quote
