http://clevelandkydex.com/index.php?...products_id=75
I'm probably going to order this one.
http://clevelandkydex.com/index.php?...products_id=75
I'm probably going to order this one.
Not the same holster, but the IWB and OWB holsters I ordered from JMCK for my 4” K frames came with the high guard at my request, because I had ordered all my autoloader holsters that way and liked them. I found that with the revolver holsters, the high guard impeded getting a good firing grip on the gun. I sent them back to Tony to have them cut down to “no guard” configuration and they’re fine now. I don’t know if the same thing would happen with the holster you’re looking at.
I am going to order a Cleveland Kydex holster next week, I hope. Emailed them today to go over a few more questions.
Let's hope they are decent holsters.
I’ve had my 642 for what seems like forever. I got a Taurus 605 to kind of help out a friend, and while it was okay and everything worked fine, I ended up just not really liking it (trigger stacked, had a weird angle to it compared to the S&W, other more intangible things), and sold it for what I had in it. The 642 was more pleasant to shoot for most loads, anyway, and easier to shoot accurately.
Then I bought a S&W 60-9 LS that, on paper, really isn’t *that* different from the 605: weighs about the same, chambered for .357, 5 shot cylinder. But it’s just ... nicer? Smoother? Matches my 642 as a steel-frame trainer better?
I don’t know. It’s a nice little gun I have no qualms about, though. And it’s easier to shoot accurately than the 642, so there’s that.
I imagine an 856 would be fine, especially to experiment with while owning a trio of jframes that work for you, but I haven’t seen one to be able to compare to my earlier Taurus revolver experiences. Dad has an old stainless 85 that he’s had to have the firing pin spring replaced on (he broke it dry-firing without a snap cap), but it’s been fine besides that.