Handled one at a regional box store last weekend. Lock up seemed a little loose. Probably within my comfort level for a used revolver but more than expected for a new one. Is this typical to the design or an outlier?
Handled one at a regional box store last weekend. Lock up seemed a little loose. Probably within my comfort level for a used revolver but more than expected for a new one. Is this typical to the design or an outlier?
no one sees what's written on the spine of his own autobiography.
If Taurus is anything like S&W, the final ratchet fitting is done by hand, which makes the outcome (tightness of lockup) completely random.
.
-----------------------------------------
Not another dime.
Now that Taurus has improved quality, has anyone dealt with their customer service? I wonder if they pay the freight both ways and have a reasonable turn around time. I do hope they continue to sell a better product. At my lgs I've examined a few of these. They have a very heavy mainspring giving a heavy double action pull. I noticed that a couple had timing issues, but exerting enough force to shoot double action caused the cylinder to turn fast enough to lock up. Hence, Taurus folks might claim that these particular revolvers are within specs. At my shop, none of the young workers has ever owned a revolver. My revolver comments fall on deaf ears and bore the listeners.
So color me intrigued.
I probably shouldn’t be so impressed by the color scheme, but looks serious.
A quick search found this - https://handguncloud.com/gun/taurus-856-ch-talo-edition
That's still true for the 7-shot L-frames. And it very much shows. Comparing hand fit 7-shot extractors from when the 686+ was a new thing to anything recent is night-and-day.
The standard 6 shot K/L/N frame "square" extractors (w/o pins) have not been a fitted part since sometime in the 90s, IIRC. 1992, maybe.
The 8-shot N-frames I don't know. I don't think so. All that I've looked at were done way too evenly to have been done by hand.