Page 24 of 51 FirstFirst ... 14222324252634 ... LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 509

Thread: M&P Core

  1. #231
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Thanks. I ask because my LGS just got a pair of Ported 2.0 PC CORE 40 in. A 4.25" and a 5". I was leaning 4.25 hoping it would work in my SIG 320 RDS duty rig...

    If I have to buy a holster regardless... what are the PF thoughts and experiences on the 4.25 vs the 5 ?

    @GJM

    @JM Campbell

    @Duke
    I bought kydex for the longer version with a full size weapon light as I like the stability.

  2. #232
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    I bought kydex for the longer version with a full size weapon light as I like the stability.
    How about the guns themselves ? I recall you sold off the 5"

  3. #233
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    How about the guns themselves ? I recall you sold off the 5"
    Still have a pair of 4.25s but have moved them out of daily use roles.

  4. #234
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Thanks. I ask because my LGS just got a pair of Ported 2.0 PC CORE 40 in. A 4.25" and a 5". I was leaning 4.25 hoping it would work in my SIG 320 RDS duty rig...

    If I have to buy a holster regardless... what are the PF thoughts and experiences on the 4.25 vs the 5 ?

    @GJM

    @JM Campbell

    @Duke
    I am shooting the five inch in competition, but haven’t done enough comparison testing with the 4.25 to offer anything intelligent beyond the 4.25 is easier to carry.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  5. #235
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    Still have a pair of 4.25s but have moved them out of daily use roles.

    Thanks this would strictly be a range /training gun as I have access to a fair amount of .40 cal.

    I have been thinking about a Glock or P3 20 style roll in special built in 40 but after shooting JM Campbells ported MNP nine with plus PMO I think the ported 40 will accomplish the same goal.

  6. #236
    Name:  19EE1A7D-1194-4AC0-BD0B-89747DFF1BBD.jpg
Views: 504
Size:  31.6 KB


    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Thanks this would strictly be a range /training gun as I have access to a fair amount of .40 cal.

    I have been thinking about a Glock or P3 20 style roll in special built in 40 but after shooting JM Campbells ported MNP nine with plus PMO I think the ported 40 will accomplish the same goal.

  7. #237
    I spent some time shooting a 4.25 CORE, alongside a 5.0 CORE, using the same lower with an Apex trigger to minimize variation besides the upper. I really enjoyed shooting the 4.25, and wouldn’t feel bad carrying it, but the 5.0 was a better shooting gun in my hands, at least today.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  8. #238
    Site Supporter JM Campbell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    I spent some time shooting a 4.25 CORE, alongside a 5.0 CORE, using the same lower with an Apex trigger to minimize variation besides the upper. I really enjoyed shooting the 4.25, and wouldn’t feel bad carrying it, but the 5.0 was a better shooting gun in my hands, at least today.
    Have you had any time on a compact 2.0?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    AKA: SkyLine1

  9. #239
    Quote Originally Posted by JM Campbell View Post
    Have you had any time on a compact 2.0?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    My normal configuration is the 4.25 core upper on a compact lower, but I chose the full size lower for evaluation purposes. I do like the 4.25 on the compact lower, and I am awaiting availability of the new 4.0 core model.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  10. #240
    Site Supporter MD7305's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    NE Tennessee

    Compact

    I had found a few of the M2.0 compacts on GB and purchased one. It arrived today. The front serrations are a very nice addition and look quite good. Another nice, unexpected surprise were the extended slide release levers. I've been following the release of this pistol since it was announced and don't remember ever hearing about extended slide levers.
    Name:  PXL_20201110_021509398.jpg
Views: 430
Size:  27.2 KB
    They're noticeably bigger than the levers on my other M2.0s
    Name:  PXL_20201110_021500157.jpg
Views: 426
Size:  46.2 KB
    Some other observations:
    -Slide to frame fit was tight but not in a negative way.
    -Trigger take up is a bit gritty but I'm hopeful it smooths out with some use.
    -Thumb Safety. The only reason I got the TS model was because the vendor I found these guns at was selling them for $70 less than NTS models. As easy and cheap as it is to remove the safety I figured it was a minor inconvenience. Having said that, the safety isn't bad. It's activation/deactivation is crisp and tactile.
    -I'm not a big fan of the plastic plates. I'm sure they're fine but I really dislike how much the hang over the slide. Probably just an esthetic thing but it's going to require me to either slightly modify the plate or a couple of my EDC holsters. I think when I can acquire a CHPWS plate it will be a non-issue.
    Name:  PXL_20201110_024656317.jpg
Views: 429
Size:  31.7 KB
    Name:  PXL_20201110_022843434.jpg
Views: 442
Size:  33.7 KB
    Name:  PXL_20201110_022832080.jpg
Views: 444
Size:  33.9 KB
    Name:  PXL_20201110_022815256.jpg
Views: 423
Size:  39.6 KB

    Overall, I really like the features S&W put into this pistol and I'm glad it's finally available. I'm really looking forward to putting it to work and trying to decide what optic to use.
    Name:  PXL_20201110_022932616.jpg
Views: 450
Size:  59.0 KB

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •