I can't even imagine how you arrive at the conclusions you do, and frankly am not even sure even you know where you're drawing the line. I'm astounded that anyone would compare modern day America with a ballot and jury box to settle disputes to overthrowing a monarchy with violence once all other reasonable options were exhausted. If you can't see the similar tactics of intimidation of individuals and neighborhoods with the "wrong" people in them as the same as KKK tactics just because the visuals are different I find it little wonder you can't separate free speech from intimidation or think it's perfectly fine to threaten people (as long as you don't threaten them...or something)