I'm not saying this isn't happening, but it strikes me as an odd choice for a few reasons.
1) She's white(insert joke here)
2) She doesn't thrill the donor class
3) I can't see the DNC mainstream having much excitement for someone who has #2 as an issue, and she probably would be less tractable than a pick who isn't from the "progressive" wing of the party, especially if Biden dies/resigns
REPETITION CREATES BELIEF
REPETITION BUILDS THE SEPARATE WORLDS WE LIVE AND DIE IN
NO EXCEPTIONS
It may be that she's a bone for the kook base, again like Palin.
"You win 100% of the fights you avoid. If you're not there when it happens, you don't lose." - William Aprill
"I've owned a guitar for 31 years and that sure hasn't made me a musician, let alone an expert. It's made me a guy who owns a guitar."- BBI
No, you can't. The progressive millennials love Warren as much as Bernie, and there are a lot of them. Add progressive women and their browbeaten husbands to that number, and that's a big block of voters.
Think about how bad it will be to have President Warren when Biden is declared incompetent or dies in office.
No one who wants to prevent that can comfortably vote for anyone except Trump.
“There is no growth in the comfort zone.”--Jocko Willink
"You can never have too many knives." --Joe Ambercrombie
She is kinda Bernie Sanders lite. Would appeal to Bernie's supporters I think.
Are both candidates in a race to see whom lose first? Geez. What a pair. Maybe it's a trap to get Trump to go full Pocahontas and continue looking like a not nice person and thus move the suburban nice people against him?
She is swamp so that makes sense. The establishment can control her.