It wouldn’t surprise me even one little bit to learn that there are criminal elements stateside that have significant electronic counter-measure chops. It would surprise me a little to find them being made available in support of the Portland unrest, and change the color of my perception of the situation, if so.
That's bullshit. Tag em and charge them with felony battery.
I imagine their TTPs are to hide back in the crowd and illuminate the cops while being three rows deep. If the cops start moving towards them, they just slip the laser in their pocket and blend in to the crowd. If the cops get too close they just drop it and kick it away.
Depends on the wavelength. However, they tend to be more expensive (general statement), and they are harder to employ because you can't see where you are pointing them.
I don't know much about RF equipment, but some jammers can be made pretty cheaply. I would hope that the feds use frequency hopping or some other modern technique, but I'm outside my knowledge base now.
This..... sometimes simple still works, fill enough channels/ bandwidth with noise and it don't matter how much you freqhop either....lines still busy. In the Mil setting this will get the jammer killed as I can target it and his surrounding grid square, Pretty sure they still won't let me call a Reg TOT on "protesters" here in the states yet though....
"So strong is this propensity of mankind, to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distinctions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions, and excite their most violent conflicts." - James Madison, Federalist No 10
An image of taken of your eye, say at the beginning of your career or before you deploy. At this point, your eyes are presumably undamaged, or at least any damage was already there. Then another image is taken a) after a known event (e.g., you got flashed hard) or b) after spending three weeks in Portland where you might've been lased briefly a couple of times. The before and after images are compared to detect damage.
I worked in a lab, so nobody was intentionally trying to hurt us, but we were exposed enough that there could have been damage from repeated smaller incidents. If we had no reportable incidents, then we were supposed to get checked periodically, say every 6 or 12 months (I forget the exact frequency).