Page 4 of 19 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 184

Thread: Federal officers in Portland may have been permanently blinded by lasers

  1. #31
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    I know someone who bought a made in China, green laser on Amazon, for his USPSA PCC, that he said was “way brighter and cost less than $100.” 5 PF dollars that it is illegally strong.







    As far as I know all the Russian Perst IR laser aimers are imported in violation of FDA standards.


  2. #32
    Site Supporter Totem Polar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    PacNW
    Quote Originally Posted by farscott View Post
    While the lasers are rightfully getting a lot of attention in this thread, I am also concerned that the "U.S. Marshals Service also reported communications jamming." I assume the USMS uses decent encrypted radios that were designed to allow communications in the presence of jamming. I know the Project 25 (P25) standard is easily jammed, so I expected the USMS would not use a radio compliant to that standard.
    It wouldn’t surprise me even one little bit to learn that there are criminal elements stateside that have significant electronic counter-measure chops. It would surprise me a little to find them being made available in support of the Portland unrest, and change the color of my perception of the situation, if so.

  3. #33
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by trailrunner View Post

    LEOs deployed to riot situations may need to start doing baseline scans. We started doing this about 5 years ago for the engineers that most often worked with lasers.
    Could you elaborate on this ?

    PM me for an official email address if necessary.

  4. #34
    Member Zincwarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Central Texas
    That's bullshit. Tag em and charge them with felony battery.

  5. #35
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by GJM View Post
    What would the law say about someone intentionally lasing you as an individual citizen?
    Nothing specific. Many states make lasing Police and other first responders a crime.

    If targeting the eyes you could make the argument it is ADW / serious bodily injury, or if circumstances permit that you thought it was a weaposn sighting laser.

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Quote Originally Posted by wvincent View Post
    Antifa likes to refer to the laser guys as "light mages". Kind of like a fantasy cartoon role.
    How hard is it to pick out and snatch someone with a handheld, visible spectrum laser?
    I imagine their TTPs are to hide back in the crowd and illuminate the cops while being three rows deep. If the cops start moving towards them, they just slip the laser in their pocket and blend in to the crowd. If the cops get too close they just drop it and kick it away.


    Quote Originally Posted by wvincent View Post
    Are the IR non-visible as dangerous to the eyes? Cause I'm sure they will switch to those if they aren't already employing them.
    Depends on the wavelength. However, they tend to be more expensive (general statement), and they are harder to employ because you can't see where you are pointing them.


    Quote Originally Posted by wvincent View Post
    And where do they get the gear to jam Fed quality comms? That shit has to be pricey. And hard to move around on the sly.
    I don't know much about RF equipment, but some jammers can be made pretty cheaply. I would hope that the feds use frequency hopping or some other modern technique, but I'm outside my knowledge base now.

  7. #37
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    TEXAS !
    Quote Originally Posted by farscott View Post
    While the lasers are rightfully getting a lot of attention in this thread, I am also concerned that the "U.S. Marshals Service also reported communications jamming." I assume the USMS uses decent encrypted radios that were designed to allow communications in the presence of jamming. I know the Project 25 (P25) standard is easily jammed, so I expected the USMS would not use a radio compliant to that standard.
    Encryptions is designed to prevent the contents of transmissions being intercepted. I don't believe it addresses jamming like some military radios do by hopping frequencies etc.

  8. #38
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Nothing specific. Many states make lasing Police and other first responders a crime.

    If targeting the eyes you could make the argument it is ADW / serious bodily injury, or if circumstances permit that you thought it was a weaposn sighting laser.
    I will show this as reason 48 on my list of why you shouldn’t be out in urban areas at night.
    Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.

  9. #39
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Encryptions is designed to prevent the contents of transmissions being intercepted. I don't believe it addresses jamming like some military radios do by hopping frequencies etc.
    This..... sometimes simple still works, fill enough channels/ bandwidth with noise and it don't matter how much you freqhop either....lines still busy. In the Mil setting this will get the jammer killed as I can target it and his surrounding grid square, Pretty sure they still won't let me call a Reg TOT on "protesters" here in the states yet though....
    "So strong is this propensity of mankind, to fall into mutual animosities, that where no substantial occasion presents itself, the most frivolous and fanciful distinctions have been sufficient to kindle their unfriendly passions, and excite their most violent conflicts." - James Madison, Federalist No 10

  10. #40
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Quote Originally Posted by HCM View Post
    Could you elaborate on this ?

    PM me for an official email address if necessary.


    An image of taken of your eye, say at the beginning of your career or before you deploy. At this point, your eyes are presumably undamaged, or at least any damage was already there. Then another image is taken a) after a known event (e.g., you got flashed hard) or b) after spending three weeks in Portland where you might've been lased briefly a couple of times. The before and after images are compared to detect damage.

    I worked in a lab, so nobody was intentionally trying to hurt us, but we were exposed enough that there could have been damage from repeated smaller incidents. If we had no reportable incidents, then we were supposed to get checked periodically, say every 6 or 12 months (I forget the exact frequency).

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •