This is stating the obvious, but I’ll say it anyway.
Law and order must be ENFORCED, or it isn’t a law, it’s a suggestion.
For instanc
e, my (Democrat) state governor said yesterday that he didn’t want to pursue a state law requiring mask use during the pandemic “because I don’t think it will increase compliance.”.
What you just posted, from the left, and on NPR (I know, I know) they had a right leaning Sheriff from East Texas who did not want to enforce masks because he felt it was unconstitutional......
Now, leaving aside the debate over whether that SHOULD be done, his answer conveyed his liberal view of law enforcement - that people “aught” to follow the law, but a reluctance to ENFORCE the law.
This kinder, gentler attitude misses the point that laws are passed to COMPEL (or, more often FORBID) certain behavior. And they only work if they’re enforced. Otherwise there is no actual compelling or forbidding going on.
So in the case of @
blues ‘s question, if law and order are ENFORCED by the authorities (police and courts), and the greater population is down with that, things work in a civilized society. If it’s not enforced, there is no law and order, and society breaks down.
There certainly seem to be pockets in the country lately where the latter approach is being tried.