Let me see if I have this right. MNPLS has systematically cut training/response options and occasionally circumvented best hiring and retention practices over political concerns, for years, with the result of increased controversial policing interactions—up to and including the largest wrongful death payout on record—as well as the culminating Floyd incident. In the intervening post-Floyd calendar month, they’ve gone from the previous model of increasing crime and issues with policing to outright looting, burning, and wholesale neighborhood lawlessness—including no-go zones and 110 gunshot wounds in a 30-day period. At this point, the trajectory is for private security for the privileged, and volunteer policing for the wider community no-go zones. All in an accelerating fibonacci spiral of stubborn progressive hole-digging and city administrative suck; a negative proof of concept for feelings-over-fact governance; a warning of the perils of progressive fundamentalism over prudent fundamentals.
Do I have that right? I really am asking, btw, I want to be fair in my analysis.