You know, when I think of some major event that happened in 2007, somehow "democrats" isn't the first thing that pops to mind...
But I understand it wouldn't fit the pattern:
The first, republicans in charge so it's the disaster's fault
The second, biggest global financial diaster since the Great Depression, so it's the democrats fault
The third, republicans in charge so it's the diaster's fault.
I have to say, that's some next level cognitive dissonance.
Last edited by jh9; 08-05-2020 at 09:46 AM. Reason: is not, not is
Biden wins according to this guy: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/05/o...-lichtman.html
[QUOTE=Glenn E. Meyer;1093668]Biden wins according to this guy: https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/05/o...-lichtman.html[/QUOTE
i am not saying that the this guy is incorrect. However....
I have never seen any positive article in NYT about Trump. I actually have not seen any single positive article about any Republican in NYT for the last 10 years. Maybe ever. I glanced through it every day. The editorial board of NYT could make a career in Pravda. I actually disregard pretty much everything from NYT these days. It's actually sad. I used to subscribe for it as well as for New Yorker
Oh, some media have biases. I didn't know that. Why even Fox News can have biases as said by DJT: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...talking-points
It's not that as much as posting anything from the NYT that supports the liberal agenda is kind of dog bites man. No one gives a fuck. Likewise, posting something from infowars (which admittedly has more journalistic credibility than the NYT right now) that supports conspiracy is not a way to distinguish yourself as an independent thinker.