My posts only represent my personal opinion and do not necessarily reflect the opinions or official policies of any employer, past or present. Obvious spelling errors are likely the result of an iPhone keyboard.
Just looked at the details on the site. Hadn't noticed before, partly because I didn't have a good enough imagination to think of it, that the WC receivers are not anodized. Instead, they get WC's "Armor Tuff" coating finish. That's far enough away from anything like Mil spec for me to look elsewhere.
Black Armor-Tuff® finish. “Multi” caliber marked. Not “T” Marked for a custom look.
GI style Upper and Lower machined from 7075-T6 Aluminum USA-sourced forgings.
M4-style feedramps for flawless feeding.
Will accept all mil-spec parts.
Multi caliber Markings
Armor-Tuff® finish
.
-----------------------------------------
Not another dime.
Does the above offend? If you have paid to be here, you can click here to put it in context.
Wilson sells an anodized lower. See @StraitR’s link a few posts up.
ETA: looks like Rob S beat me to it.
Wow. Posting something and immediately having three people point out I'm factually wrong in an easily verifiable way is not an experience I'm used to.
Had to figure out what went wrong. I had gone to the WC site directly, and drilled down into their stripped receivers through the matched set category. In the page for matched sets, there is no differentiation in the descriptions. I even went up from the specific product page I quoted and checked the index page again.
Complicated way to figure out that if you want just the basic, anodized version, you have to order them individually.
$160 for an upper/lower combo with WC's likely machining quality doesn't totally suck.
.
-----------------------------------------
Not another dime.