If it does go that way (the court allows exterior interference to dictate process and outcome), defense will have all kinds of running ground for an appeal. While I hold the system ''suspect'' in many cases, especially in these inflammatory times, I do have faith that a reasonable and just outcome will result.
''Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity.'' ―Albert Einstein
Full disclosure per the Pistol-Forum CoC: I am the author of Quantitative Ammunition Selection.
Having our respective career perspectives, we both know how wrong things can go during legal proceedings. It's difficult these days to maintain that faith in the system, but it is all that we can do. More often than not, the process works, but I "get" the concern. I am concerned, too, and watching this all with great interest.
''Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity.'' ―Albert Einstein
Full disclosure per the Pistol-Forum CoC: I am the author of Quantitative Ammunition Selection.
Transcript of George Floyd arrest:
https://dam.tmz.com/document/f6/o/20...b50af753a6.pdf
That's a pretty tough read. I can't imagine a sane, sober person responding to officers in the way that Floyd did. Of course that doesn't mean he deserves to be dead, but holy crap did he seem uncooperative and twitchy.
It reads to me like Floyd died from the result of his incoherent uncooperativeness colliding with MPD's bad policy on how to restrain people. I can understand a world where Chauvin winds up with a manslaughter conviction, but I think murder is going to be a tough sell unless there are some salient points which are not publicly available.
ETA: I would not be shocked if MPD ends up having to pay out a big settlement to Floyd's family and being forced to change their policy on how restraint is done.
Does it have to be a jury trial? Do the local laws allow a judge? Although, I've read that juries and judges give similar verdicts.
The jury selection experts will make a buck, if someone will pay for them.