I'll try not to make this story too long, but just for background info:
My Dad sold insurance for a good part of his life, as did his dad. When I was but a young teenager, my Grandfather passed and left a collection of shotguns to my younger brother and I. Nothing crazy like Perozzis, just some nice OU's like Winchester 101 Pidgeon Grades, and a Belgian A5, a total of 12 guns.
So my Father added a rider to his homeowners insurance policy to cover the guns, said they wouldn't be covered otherwise.
After I was done with all of my schooling and such, and got my first home, the guns came with me. My Father was still doing insurance and did my policy, with a rider for the guns also. .
Fast forward 20 years, I need to redo my insurance and my agent sent me the firearms rider to review and see if I wanted to rewrite with the new company.
Well 1/2 of my Grandad's guns are now gone-my brother took his share. Of course I've now amassed a collection of my own. Again nothing crazy, but there are some nice ones like a WC 1911, and a large number of regular Glocks, Smiths, SIG's and the like. Some AR's and hunting rifles.
So i'm trying to decide if I should insure all of my guns, some, or none.
I understand the benefits of coverage, but it feels a little weird insuring a Glock (and many other makes).
So to those with modest to large collections; What do you do?
Thanks