Joined the CCFR and donated $25 to the CSSA.
I guess you could say I'm a Canadian gun rights activist now, eh. Gonna go fill up my truck with petrol and stop by Timmies, don't need a Toque though, it's aboot 18°C out there today.
Joined the CCFR and donated $25 to the CSSA.
I guess you could say I'm a Canadian gun rights activist now, eh. Gonna go fill up my truck with petrol and stop by Timmies, don't need a Toque though, it's aboot 18°C out there today.
"If I ever needed to hunt in a tuxedo, then this would be the rifle I'd take." - okie john
"Not being able to govern events, I govern myself." - Michel De Montaigne
Donated to both, put this in my note:
Pistol-Forum.com support
So they know how great we are.
Thanks everyone for the support! Here is an interesting video update from the CCFR, just so you can see what your dollars are supporting up here:
For those who don't want to sit through video (this is usually me as well) here's the bullet points: the CCFR doesn't usually pursue court actions but in this case they have retained constitutional lawyers to file a suit alleging a Charter Rights breach. The team they've retained is experienced in this exact type of action and are confident there's a case here, so this may be the big one.
The suit hasn't been filed yet but the pin has been pulled. We're readying up our throwing arms, I'll keep you updated as things move ahead.
“Minister Blair is either too inept to comprehend the scope of his regulations… or he lied to the government and Canadians,” the Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association (CSAAA) said in a statement on Tuesday. The organization is now in regular calls with federal officials in an effort to hammer out various points of confusion. In a phone call last Friday with the federal departments of Public Safety, Global Affairs Canada and others, Alison de Groot, the managing director at the CSAAA, said officials were unable to answer technical questions like how shipments of now-prohibited firearms would be handled by authorities. One distributor, for example, was unsure whether authorities would intercept an incoming shipment that bundled legal firearms together with those that are now illegal. Officials were scrambling for answers in what appeared to be a hasty regulatory change that came as a surprise to both government and retailers. “They assumed that the shipments would come in separately because they did not understand how the import certificates work,” de Groot said. “It was quite clear to us that those departments did not know this (ban) was coming, either.”
https://nationalpost.com/news/incohe...hunting-rifles