Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 142

Thread: Wilson Combat goes all in with the SIG P320

  1. #1

    Wilson Combat goes all in with the SIG P320

    First it was a Wilson grip module. But now Wilson is making an entire pistol. Or, more correctly, reworking the entire pistol:

    https://shopwilsoncombat.com/Order-W...eid=137f2add31


  2. #2
    I like the looks. But my first reaction is, "No optics cut?"

    Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    SE Texas
    Not much into the P320 these days, but I have to say I like what I see.

  4. #4
    Site Supporter JSGlock34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    USA
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokarev View Post
    I like the looks. But my first reaction is, "No optics cut?"

    Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
    Same reaction. Considering the diversity of SIG optics cuts too, there's room to play here.
    "When the phone rang, Parker was in the garage, killing a man."

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by JSGlock34 View Post
    Same reaction. Considering the diversity of SIG optics cuts too, there's room to play here.
    I keep waiting for Unity Tactical to drop the ATOM 2.0. It should be more or less a universal mounting plate that will work on any number of pistols once the slide is machined.

    Wilson could no doubt license the Unity system or come out with its own version.

    http://soldiersystems.net/2020/01/23...nity-tactical/

  6. #6
    Site Supporter JSGlock34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    USA
    I think that a slide cut should at least permit one direct mount option. My personal opinion is that, like it or not, the DPP is the mil-spec mounting standard thanks to the M17. There are good reasons to take an approach like the STI DUO (DPP footprint allows a direct mount, or you use an adapter plate for something else). I suspect there are RMR/SRO prototypes aligned to a DPP mounting footprint somewhere in Trijicon's R&D department due to the M17 adoption.

    I find it interesting that CBP wants something that direct mounts to a MOS cut...
    "When the phone rang, Parker was in the garage, killing a man."

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by JSGlock34 View Post
    I think that a slide cut should at least permit one direct mount option. My personal opinion is that, like it or not, the DPP is the mil-spec mounting standard thanks to the M17. There are good reasons to take an approach like the STI DUO (DPP footprint allows a direct mount, or you use an adapter plate for something else). I suspect there are RMR/SRO prototypes aligned to a DPP mounting footprint somewhere in Trijicon's R&D department due to the M17 adoption.

    I find it interesting that CBP wants something that direct mounts to a MOS cut...
    CHPWS and Bobro both have some form of P320 adapters:

    http://www.chpws.com/product/sig-p32...-adapter-plate


    http://www.bobroengineering.com/SIG-...IGHT_p_51.html

    No comment on what CBP is trying to do....

  8. #8
    Couldn't tell from the video..... Is the FCG upgraded with better parts?

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Navin Johnson View Post
    Couldn't tell from the video..... Is the FCG upgraded with better parts?
    No.

    Not unless you order it with the "action tune".

  10. #10
    Not to be negative, but seems very "meh." They added a grip module, slide serrations, sights, and barrel coating. Cool I guess, but really missed the boat imo by not offering an optic cut.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •