Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 40

Thread: Any credible testing of .357 mag from a carbine?

  1. #1

    Any credible testing of .357 mag from a carbine?

    As anybody seen any credible gel testing of .357 mag ammo from a carbine?

    I'm thinking of using Hornady Custom 158 gr in my Marlin .357 18 1/2" carbine for defensive purposes. If this a decent load I can easily reload and duplicate it for practice and what not.

    I looked around but didn't see much on the subject online.
    Last edited by 4given; 03-31-2020 at 05:25 PM.

  2. #2
    Interesting trends at http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/357mag.html

    A good rule of thumb for pistol cartridges is to expect a ~300 fps when going from a long-barreled revolver to 20" carbine.


    Okie John
    “The reliability of the 30-06 on most of the world’s non-dangerous game is so well established as to be beyond intelligent dispute.” Finn Aagaard
    "Don't fuck with it" seems to prevent the vast majority of reported issues." BehindBlueI's

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by okie john View Post
    Interesting trends at http://www.ballisticsbytheinch.com/357mag.html

    A good rule of thumb for pistol cartridges is to expect a ~300 fps when going from a long-barreled revolver to 20" carbine.


    Okie John
    The Hornady Custom 158gr loading lists 1250 FPS on the box label. I don't have any idea the length of the test barrel. According to the chart below 1400 FPS is the top end of the bullets design envelope,


    Name:  XTP Velocity Chart.jpg
Views: 849
Size:  65.7 KB

  4. #4
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    The Chopping Block

    He's on youtube.

    My own playing around has found factory remington 125gr sjhp to vaporize in milk jugs. Would be great for yotes on down.

    My handloaded 140gr XTPs hold together in water

  5. #5
    The Chopping Block is about it. He does use ordnance gel but you can certainly argue the tests don't use a significant sample size since he typically only fires a couple rounds.

    FWIW, I roll with the Federal/American Eagle 158 JSP in both my 4" GP100 and my 1894c. The GP100 is a woodsbumming gun, so deep is good. I do keep a stash of 125 Gold Sabres and some .38+P Gold Dots on hand in case I need to roll with it in an urban/suburban setting.
    I was into 10mm Auto before it sold out and went mainstream, but these days I'm here for the revolver and epidemiology information.

  6. #6
    Site Supporter OlongJohnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    "carbine-infested rural (and suburban) areas"
    Quote Originally Posted by 4given View Post
    The Hornady Custom 158gr loading lists 1250 FPS on the box label. I don't have any idea the length of the test barrel. According to the chart below 1400 FPS is the top end of the bullets design envelope,


    Name:  XTP Velocity Chart.jpg
Views: 849
Size:  65.7 KB
    The 158 FP is a better choice for magnum loads in a long barrel. Or the 180 HP, which isn't on that chart.
    .
    -----------------------------------------
    Not another dime.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Lester Polfus View Post
    The Chopping Block is about it. He does use ordnance gel but you can certainly argue the tests don't use a significant sample size since he typically only fires a couple rounds.
    Has TCB returned to using 10% ordnance gelatin again?

    For awhile there, he was using the clear polymer gel junk (even after he did not one—but two—videos discrediting it as a valid terminal ballistic test medium) so I just ''tuned-out'' from his work.
    ''Politics is for the present, but an equation is for eternity.'' ―Albert Einstein

    Full disclosure per the Pistol-Forum CoC: I am the author of Quantitative Ammunition Selection.

  8. #8
    I think the 158gr XTP would probably hold up "okay" from a carbine... you might get a bit of over expansion, but I bet it would retain enough weight and penetration to still be suitable for two legged and lighter four legged creatures. The XTP is a pretty "tough" bullet.

    The flat point 158 XTP would probably be a better choice for the carbine if you want to max out penetration. May not be ideal in a handgun, depending on what velocity you drive them at.

  9. #9
    The 158 Gold Dot has been mentioned favorably on several hunting forums & by some hunting focus writers out of rifle/carbine length barrels.

    The 158 XTP usually seem to get good reports to for hunting.

    Brian Pearce has written at least a few articles about hunting with 357 long guns in "Rifle" & "Handloader".

    The 125 JHP tends to function like a varmint bullet, based on reports on rabbits and coyotes I suspect its similar to 223/5.56 with ~55 JHP/Ballistic tip type bullets.

    Many people also seem to like Hardcast 158 to 180 grain bullets for hunting.

  10. #10
    The Nostomaniac 03RN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    New Hampshire
    Quote Originally Posted by the Schwartz View Post
    Has TCB returned to using 10% ordnance gelatin again?

    For awhile there, he was using the clear polymer gel junk (even after he did not one—but two—videos discrediting it as a valid terminal ballistic test medium) so I just ''tuned-out'' from his work.
    All his new ones use clear.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •