Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Has anyone seen ammunition testing done with very short barrel 5.56?

  1. #1
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition

    Has anyone seen ammunition testing done with very short barrel 5.56?

    The current PDW thread has me wondering...

    A few years ago I built a 7.5” AR pistol as a range toy. However, somewhat to my surprise I’ve found it is actually very handy and reliable over the course of 800 or so rounds, and with current events it has been pressed into trunk service. I figure it’s better than throwing rocks, and I can easily make accurate hits under stress out to the limited distance that I could reasonably and legally be expected to defend myself as a civilian. It has a 1/7 barrel.

    By way of background (and as an attempt to head off the “7.5” 5.56 is crap and will get you killed” comments) I’m using it strictly as a “oh shit” weapon - when I feel the need a more capable carbine rides on the floor behind the front seat. The 7.5” currently stays in the car all of the time stashed and tether locked under the parcel deck just like my fire extinguisher, trauma kit and jack. I realize it’s not optimal, but neither is the small fire extinguisher I carry.

    My question - has anyone seen testing on what type of quality load is likely to stabilize best in such a short barrel? Heavy or light? I’m not concerned about terminal effects beyond the ability to stabilize at this point - there is a bit of talk in the PDW thread where commonly used defensive rounds tumble. I’ve shot mostly crap range ammunition through it (probably 90% WWB .223) and have never seen evidence of tumbling.

    This is likely to get rebarreled as a .300 BLK at some point but it’s what I have right now.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  2. #2
    Site Supporter DocGKR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    What is the barrel twist?

    With such a short barrel in 5.56mm, you are likely best off using an expanding projectile like a 50-55 gr TSX or GMX, 55 gr Gold Dot/Fusion, or 55 gr TBBC.

    Under 10-12" barrels or so, .300 BLK is superior to 5.56 mm.
    Facts matter...Feelings Can Lie

  3. #3
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    It’s a 1/7 - that was buried above.
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  4. #4
    Member diananike's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2019
    Location
    Northern Manitoba
    There’s a series Of 7.5 gel tests in the YouTube channel poboyspecial
    Also great for figuring out what 5.56 does at long range.
    Spoiler it’s not like getting smacked with a .22

  5. #5
    Site Supporter rob_s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SE FL

    5.56 and 300 blk in <8" barrels

    Do we already have a thread or resource on this? Perhaps 8" is the wrong threshold, maybe it should be <10"?

    I'm curious as to where we hit the "floor" with specific loads as well as perhaps recommendations for loads given that the decision to fire them from (for example) a 7.5" barrel has already been made.

  6. #6
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    I started this one about 5.56, but it didn’t attract a lot of attention.

    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....rt-barrel-5-56
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  7. #7
    Shit, the blast alone from 5.56 at that barrel length is enough for me to go .300BO, not to mention that if you want to suppress it, your choices are somewhat limited.
    #RESIST

  8. #8
    Site Supporter rob_s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SE FL
    Quote Originally Posted by HeavyDuty View Post
    I started this one about 5.56, but it didn’t attract a lot of attention.

    https://pistol-forum.com/showthread....rt-barrel-5-56
    maybe we could get @LittleLebowski to merge them to talk about both calibers

  9. #9
    Site Supporter rob_s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SE FL
    Quote Originally Posted by LittleLebowski View Post
    Shit, the blast alone from 5.56 at that barrel length is enough for me to go .300BO, not to mention that if you want to suppress it, your choices are somewhat limited.
    I know there are a ton of other issues, but I was hoping to strip this down strictly to the ballistics at various lengths.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Central PA
    I was going to start a similar thread but since its already here.... Id be interested if 7.62X39 could be added to the discussion? The data im looking for is what is the barrel length threshold for effectiveness to distance X. This would be helpful for individuals to evaluate which solution fits their circumstances.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •