Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Sig settles P320 lawsuits

  1. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Rochester Hills, MI
    Quote Originally Posted by Tokarev View Post
    Me, neither. Unless SIG were to send new chassis guts along with a new slide that's machined for the disconnector.

    SIG still just needs to bite the bullet and issue an actual manufacturer recall vs a voluntary upgrade. But maybe it is too late for that.

    Sent from my SM-A505U using Tapatalk
    Late or not, it would have been better had they just done that from the get go. Doing it now would at least make them publicly admit that there’s something legitimately wrong with the original design and it needs fixing. I mean, crap happens and everyone makes mistakes, but this isn’t how you handle a mistake like that.

  2. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    1984
    Is the current Production GTG? What is the consensus?

  3. #13
    Site Supporter psalms144.1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Bloomington, IN
    Cheby - fully "upgraded" current production pistols SHOULD be safe. That doesn't take into account breakage on MIM parts (safeties are a high break count item on M17/M18s), self-disassembling RSAs, and other assorted warts. I still wouldn't spend my money on one - maybe in five years, but not now.

    Then again, since it doesn't appear that ANYTHING can convince Sig that quality trumps quantity, they might never get back to where they used to be.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •