Pretty sure I know the answer to this question, are these any good?
I bought some of these for my G41 as range mags and seem okay. Don't know if I would use them as carry mags or not.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Pretty sure I know the answer to this question, are these any good?
I bought some of these for my G41 as range mags and seem okay. Don't know if I would use them as carry mags or not.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Made in Korea maybe?
Possibly fine for practice mags. I’d stick to OEM Glock magazines for defensive use.
I have three of those for a G17 and they work fine for practice, in my experience.
Executive summary-No on carry, yes for practice.
I had a bunch of them like 15 years ago for my Glock 17.
They had some issues at first but I took them apart and cleaned up the internals. I replaced the springs with genuine Glock springs.
You need to run the shit out of them so the inside of the mag and the follower smooth out. After that they ran 100%.
These are contract overrun production from issued weapons used by Blue House security, ROK intel and others. They are not fit for duty use but work well for range purposes. You will have additional stoppage drills as a result. Weak springs result in occasional FTF, more pronounced with HP or flat meplats. Baseplates are also more brittle than OEM, will crack when dropped on concrete. Replacement plates do fit but make sure you use orange or blue to mark clearly, prevent casual mixing with originals later _ you will care.
Why is the title of this thread “ASIAN MILITARY?”
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The title is:
Asian military Glock mags
Word wrap or a carriage return / line feed made the title 2 lines.
These mags are sold on CDNN
https://www.cdnnsports.com/glock-17-...U#.XoFP1qQpB-E
I probably cut and pasted the text from the page
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk