Saw this on another site. Looks tasty.
Looks like it's legit: Shooting Illustrated
Original Post Source
Saw this on another site. Looks tasty.
Looks like it's legit: Shooting Illustrated
Original Post Source
I do too, although I have no pragmatic use for one.
”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB
Can I get a non-take down with iron sights? Or at least a continuous rail across the top to add sights to?
Originally Posted by MattyD380
Don’t need, but kind of want. With a side folder brace (a flat one like the Sig MPX)...
That would be Sexy.
“A gun is a tool, Marian; no better or no worse than any other tool: an axe, a shovel or anything. A gun is as good or as bad as the man using it. Remember that.” - Shane
Why do we need a take down barrel on a pistol?
Why is there no way to add front BUIS?
Other than that, I'd be interested in taking a look if it's reliable and accurate. Mated to an SBA4, could be a cool PCC alternative.
Another vote for a non takedown version (of both the carbine and the charger). A continuous rail would be nice as well for irons.
Instagram: sometimesishootCs
Give it time a company like Midwest industries might come out with one in a few months
I don’t think I’ve seen him go all giggly and drop an “eF! It!” during a review. I just wish he didn’t keep calling it a “carbine”.
The only way the takedown feature makes sense is to leave a suppressor attached and in a discreet bag. But the only way Ruger makes that whole series of guns is with the takedown feature. They’d need to re-engineer a non-takedown version.
I can see me getting one.
These are giving me the wantsies.
--Josh
“Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.” - Tacitus.
Reply With Quote