Page 13 of 17 FirstFirst ... 31112131415 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 130 of 165

Thread: USPSA Division Equipment Rules (Guns)

  1. #121
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Western Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    I thought Production was meant to be an entry and economy division, not an additional challenge and a high pressure specialty.
    Intent is for IDPA, though I agree with your points about magazines and most modifications.

  2. #122
    In my cynical opinion, USPSA Production was put in to compete with IDPA SSP.
    Code Name: JET STREAM

  3. #123
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    1984
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    In my cynical opinion, USPSA Production was put in to compete with IDPA SSP.
    Yes, to a certain degree. Then Production USPSA guns arrived: Stock 2, 3, and Shadow 2 which are essentially Limited Minor guns. Then Carry Optics killed the whole Production thing as an idea to me. It is alive in places where 10rds mags limit is more apparent.
    Don't get me wrong, I love Production. I guess, I am still a timmy deep down inside and would prefer to have a real production (Let's call it Timmy) division.
    Last edited by cheby; 02-20-2020 at 08:21 PM.

  4. #124
    I am not sure what we're discussing anymore, but since everyone is weighing in on the Production... I really wish I had quit shooting it sooner. I also wish that the price of playing with nice toys in the Limited was a bit less steep.
    Doesn't read posts longer than two paragraphs.

  5. #125
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    Western Ohio
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    In my cynical opinion, USPSA Production was put in to compete with IDPA SSP.
    And thank God Production pistol specifications didn't stay that way.

  6. #126
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2019
    Location
    holding the head of Perseus in my support hand
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    In my cynical opinion, USPSA Production was put in to compete with IDPA SSP.
    suits my limited goals (see what I did there) fine, and I use the same gear for both except more mag carriers.

  7. #127
    Good with me.
    I have a younger agile friend who made the choice to push Production instead of paying for the latest and greatest in Limited.
    Code Name: JET STREAM

  8. #128
    Quote Originally Posted by YVK View Post
    I am not sure what we're discussing anymore, but since everyone is weighing in on the Production... I really wish I had quit shooting it sooner. I also wish that the price of playing with nice toys in the Limited was a bit less steep.
    You're right this is turning into 5 different threads. Since it's happening though...Why do wish you quit it sooner?

    Do you think the nice toys are required? I shot limited a long time back and had a Brazos gun. It was about 3K back then which I thought was ridiculous. Now they are probably 5K. I was looking at it again recently and thinking if I did it again it would be with a CZ or probably the DWX. People seem to be able to do OK with the Tanfo's and they aren't that expensive.

  9. #129
    Member Zincwarrior's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Central Texas
    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Watson View Post
    In my cynical opinion, USPSA Production was put in to compete with IDPA SSP.
    Thats exactly why it was put in.

  10. #130
    Site Supporter rob_s's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    SE FL
    what's driving the move away from Production for you guys? What about it attracted you in the beginning and what is now leading you away from it?

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •