To the point of the OP, I'm amazed this is even a question.
No matter what, I wouldn't vote for Bloomberg.
There's not a single candidate or potential candidate (I'm including the incumbent) whose ethics I respect, but as usual, choosing the lesser evil is our only option, as I see it. Bloomberg sure ain't gonna be "the lesser evil".
"Therefore, since the world has still... Much good, but much less good than ill,
And while the sun and moon endure, Luck's a chance, but trouble's sure,
I'd face it as a wise man would, And train for ill and not for good." -- A.E. Housman
@SAWBONES
Take that survey if you would. I'm curious if you'd come away with the same top two picks as @Clusterfrack and I did.
There's nothing civil about this war.
"Therefore, since the world has still... Much good, but much less good than ill,
And while the sun and moon endure, Luck's a chance, but trouble's sure,
I'd face it as a wise man would, And train for ill and not for good." -- A.E. Housman
I'd vote for a buck toothed, clap ridden New Orleans whore who practices Scientology before I'd vote for Bloomberg.
We may lose and we may win, but we will never be here again.......