Page 503 of 725 FirstFirst ... 3403453493501502503504505513553603 ... LastLast
Results 5,021 to 5,030 of 7244

Thread: Coronavirus thread

  1. #5021
    Modding this sack of shit BehindBlueI's's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Location
    Midwest
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRoland View Post
    It does not explicitly say that the President has been given or is taking the drug. That statement is pretty conspicuous in its absence.
    I hadn't considered that. That does make me wonder something, though. Would the doc be allowed to say that one way or the other? HIPAA and all that? I don't know how that intersects with POTUS. I get Trump can release it himself as he likes, but could the doctor?
    Sorta around sometimes for some of your shitty mod needs.

  2. #5022
    banana republican blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mtns
    This is one case where I'd actually like to hear "I'm not a doctor, but I play one on TV".

    (Hey, I could care less what he takes. Maybe they should mix some abilify in there as well. )
    There's nothing civil about this war.

  3. #5023
    THE THIRST MUTILATOR Nephrology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West
    Quote Originally Posted by BehindBlueI's View Post
    I hadn't considered that. That does make me wonder something, though. Would the doc be allowed to say that one way or the other? HIPAA and all that? I don't know how that intersects with POTUS. I get Trump can release it himself as he likes, but could the doctor?
    Current treatment would be certainly considered HIPAA protected information - Trump would have to sign a release for this information to be transmitted to anyone except those to whom it is relevant for direct patient care (eg other docs).

    That said, lots of other information in the letter would also considered HIPAA protected ("eg He receives regular COVID19 testing, all negative to date.) so Trump must have signed a release for that information to be released in the letter as well. The equivocation on whether or not he is taking HCQ seems to be deliberate to me.

    Quote Originally Posted by MickAK View Post
    I dunno where that comes from. I have a difficult time going along with most conspiracies about this but the rampant shilling against hydroxychloroquine is just weird.

    It's a 50 year old medicine and people act like Trump cooked it up in the White House garage and started hocking it like patent medicine in the old West.
    While there may be people in the media/lay public who are arguing for/against the use of the drug for COVID-19, I assure you there is no shilling happening in either direction in medical community. There has been, however, a lot of recent studies on the drug's use for COVID-19, and so far the sum of the evidence indicates that it does not help . Frankly, there was never a good rationale for its use to begin with, which largely originated in the hare-brained ideas of a questionable French scientist.

    Its also worth noting that age doesn't really have anything to do with its safety, or frankly how well we understand it, either. We understand how to appropriately dose it for patients with RA or lupus for maximal clinical effect, and also know what side effects to monitor for in that setting.

    The danger is that in the US, HCQ has been prescribed at different dosages, by different providers, in different settings, for patients with a wide spectrum of COVID-19 severity. If you are a provider who is not used to prescribing HCQ, and you are not adequately monitoring them for adverse effects (e.g. writing it for an outpatient), there is a very real potential for harm. This is true of all medications, which is why we rely so heavily on clinical trials and national society best practices guidelines and consult our colleagues in other specialties when we feel out of our depth.
    Last edited by Nephrology; 05-19-2020 at 09:06 AM.

  4. #5024
    Member JHC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    North Georgia
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRoland View Post
    This is getting to be the politics thread, but the doctor released a statement that says that, after many discussions, he and the President agreed the benefits outweighed the risks.

    It does not explicitly say that the President has been given or is taking the drug. That statement is pretty conspicuous in its absence.
    My first reaction is that this was rhetorical flourish but he's not actually taking it. But then I read where Cheney's former cardiologist opined that it's possible he is based on his elevated risk if he contracts this disease.

    “The White House medical unit obviously made a calculated decision that they considered his risk of taking the drug lower than his risk of actually contracting the virus,” he said. “My calculations, I think his risk… he probably has a 15 to 20 percent chance of dying of this virus should he contract it.”

    So maybe it's BS, maybe not.

    https://www.rawstory.com/2020/05/dic...e-coronavirus/
    “Remember, being healthy is basically just dying as slowly as possible,” Ricky Gervais

  5. #5025
    Abducted by Aliens Borderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Camano Island WA.
    Quote Originally Posted by BehindBlueI's View Post
    I wonder how long the White House doctor would be the White House doctor if he told Trump no.

    Kind of makes you wonder why staffers and aides are getting it if we have access to a prophylactic.
    Trump has an 86% turnover for his "A" team as of this month. Those are members of his executive office and not cabinet positions. I suspect if the president ever gets sick from self medication the good doctor is history.
    Last edited by Borderland; 05-19-2020 at 09:39 AM.
    In the P-F basket of deplorables.

  6. #5026
    THE THIRST MUTILATOR Nephrology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West
    Quote Originally Posted by JHC View Post
    My first reaction is that this was rhetorical flourish but he's not actually taking it. But then I read where Cheney's former cardiologist opined that it's possible he is based on his elevated risk if he contracts this disease.

    “The White House medical unit obviously made a calculated decision that they considered his risk of taking the drug lower than his risk of actually contracting the virus,” he said. “My calculations, I think his risk… he probably has a 15 to 20 percent chance of dying of this virus should he contract it.”

    So maybe it's BS, maybe not.

    https://www.rawstory.com/2020/05/dic...e-coronavirus/
    Trump is >65 and obese so he is definitely at increased risk for severe illness if he contracts COVID-19. I don't know if it's really possible to put an exact number on it at this time, given that we still don't have a great handle on infection morbidity/mortality rates.

    We still have no evidence that HCQ does anything at all for COVID-19 - if anything, we have ever-increasing amounts of evidence suggesting that it is not effective - so I question the decisionmaking here somewhat. My guess is that if Trump is taking HCQ, it is on some level at his own insistence. It certainly isn't evidence based medicine.

  7. #5027
    banana republican blues's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Blue Ridge Mtns
    A few weeks from now...somewhere in America:



    "Mom, can I have some more Hydroxychloroquine...please?"
    There's nothing civil about this war.

  8. #5028
    Site Supporter ccmdfd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Southeastern NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Nephrology View Post
    Trump is >65 and obese so he is definitely at increased risk for severe illness if he contracts COVID-19. I don't know if it's really possible to put an exact number on it at this time, given that we still don't have a great handle on infection morbidity/mortality rates.

    We still have no evidence that HCQ does anything at all for COVID-19 - if anything, we have ever-increasing amounts of evidence suggesting that it is not effective - so I question the decisionmaking here somewhat. My guess is that if Trump is taking HCQ, it is on some level at his own insistence. It certainly isn't evidence based medicine.
    My thoughts exactly. If the doctor refused, he'd be replaced by one who wouldn't refuse.

  9. #5029
    THE THIRST MUTILATOR Nephrology's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    West
    Quote Originally Posted by ccmdfd View Post
    My thoughts exactly. If the doctor refused, he'd be replaced by one who wouldn't refuse.
    So not that different than many other outpatients then

    "Listen doc, I know it's my low T.... just give me my nandrolone or I'll find someone who will!!"

    (Funny enough, that's a direct quote from a patient I had once... in the emergency dept )

  10. #5030
    Abducted by Aliens Borderland's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Camano Island WA.
    Quote Originally Posted by Nephrology View Post
    So not that different than many other outpatients then

    "Listen doc, I know it's my low T.... just give me my nandrolone or I'll find someone who will!!"

    (Funny enough, that's a direct quote from a patient I had once... in the emergency dept )
    My wife had prescription authority and dealt with a lot of low income folks. She has some stories. The drug problem is much worse than most people realize.
    In the P-F basket of deplorables.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •