Page 666 of 725 FirstFirst ... 166566616656664665666667668676716 ... LastLast
Results 6,651 to 6,660 of 7244

Thread: Coronavirus thread

  1. #6651
    Site Supporter ccmdfd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Southeastern NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Lester Polfus View Post
    I have good insurance, and I'm guessing that if I survived an ICU stay on ECMO, my next stop after I got healthy enough to shuffle across the room would be to a bankruptcy attorney.
    Well you could always:

    1. Get yourself a Cabelas Club card and use it to pay the bill. Then you could use the rewards $ for guns and or ammo.

    Or

    2. If you're lucky enough to make it out of ICU after ECMO, play the lottery ASAP.

    I don't know the national numbers, but our ECMO survival rate for COVID is rather, rather, rather low.

  2. #6652
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by whomever View Post
    Not an expert, but here's a discussion:

    https://medical.mit.edu/covid-19-upd...cr-test-result
    Good link. Thank you!
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  3. #6653
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    In the desert, looking for water.
    COVID pg 666.

  4. #6654
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    the Deep South
    Quote Originally Posted by HeavyDuty View Post
    Interesting comment from a fellow widow who is the current coroner and former Sheriff of an extremely rural county in MO and a former services nurse (not sure which one.) We aren’t close, just occasional on-line acquaintances.

    She claims the majority of positive PCR tests they are seeing are false positives.

    I am having a very hard time believing this. Has any of our medical professionals seen anything like this?
    PCR tests vs antigen tests may be the miscommunication. Antigen tests are not good at all and must be administered within five days of onset of symptoms. Under real world conditions you can get to about 70% specificity with the BD test. I don't know about other brands.

    As Neph mentioned, some patients continue to test positive long after infection has seemingly ended, sometimes interspersed with negative tests. The ID doc here that I talked with about this called them intermittent positives, I think. As far as I know, no one has been able to recover infectious virus from these patients. I wonder if this observation is normal for most respiratory infections and had simply never been observed before.

    Lastly, some labs are just better than others. Last spring we looked at bringing in a person with great experience in respiratory virus PCR test development to help get our lab-developed test online. I interviewed her, and when I explained how many tests per day we needed to run and my plan for how to do it, she told me that what I wanted was impossible and she told me why it was impossible. I thought she was much too focused on limitations rather than possibilities, and we didn't hire her. Since then we've done exactly what we planned to do, and it's worked really well. I don't know if this woman simply had bad technique, but according to her, we should be lit up like a Christmas tree with all the false positives right now. That hasn't happened. If we'd hired her, maybe we'd be having more problems. I have no idea. She knew a lot more about what we needed to do than anyone on our team. She must have had some good reason for predicting failure. Whatever the reason, I'm sure glad she was mistaken!

    Sent from my moto e5 cruise using Tapatalk

  5. #6655
    Quote Originally Posted by Duelist View Post
    COVID pg 666.
    I noticed that as well.

  6. #6656
    Quote Originally Posted by TheRoland View Post
    Not a medical professional, and the plural of anecdote is not data, but I'm right near you and am seeing two things in my immediate social group now:

    1. People that clearly have COVID (loss of taste, sick) getting negative tests. And...
    2. Random people getting random positives that have no symptoms.

    My social group has had more of #1 than #2 now, which is scary.

    My personal opinion, looking at Boston/Worcester area wastewater graphs (which likely is the same as southern NH), is that more people have it than ever before and the wheels are coming off at labs due to workload.
    I'm not a medical expert by any stretch, but I got put on orders a few weeks ago with the national guard to work as a contact tracer here in Vermont so I've seen and spoken to a whole bunch of cases. With regards to #2 they were probably asymptomatic cases. I've seen a whole bunch of people who had no symptoms whatsoever but were covid positive and were passing it on to other people who did get sick. Talked to a whole family who all tested positive and had no idea they had it. They only got tested because a kid in one of their children's classes popped hot. The way our database works we can pretty easily see which close contacts later test positive and what symptoms they had.

    With regards to #1, again no expert on this, but the info i was given is that false negatives can be a thing with pcr but in some cases for people not showing symptoms yet, they may not have waited long enough from exposure. Here in Vermont for example, the quarantine standard is either 14 days or 7 days and then a negative test. If I remember the training correctly something like 95% of cases that develop symptoms will do so by day 7, but before day 5 after exposure that number is significantly lower, where that person may have covid and still not trip a test.

    Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk

  7. #6657
    Site Supporter Sensei's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Greece/NC
    Quote Originally Posted by Lester Polfus View Post
    I have good insurance, and I'm guessing that if I survived an ICU stay on ECMO, my next stop after I got healthy enough to shuffle across the room would be to a bankruptcy attorney.
    I’m an ICU physician at one of the busiest ECMO centers in the world (one of our faculty invented the technology 40 years ago). We cannulate about 150 people per year. I’ve been in the SICU for the past 4 weeks where we manage VV ECMO for respiratory failure. I’ve yet to see a COVID patient get de-cannulated and I’ve seen 2 die this month. We have 8 alive on the pump and all but 3 have been cannulated since before I arrived. The ones that have been cannulated for over a month are circling the drain, and the fresher ones show no real signs of lung recovery. Every one of them has required horse tranquilizer levels of sedation while on ECMO. This is in stark contrast to our institutional experience for non-COVID respiratory failure, and even our COVID experience in the Spring where 50% survived. Something has changed in this wave - they are younger but much sicker.


    Bottom line, there is no way in hell that I’d accept ECMO for COVID as I have no desire to die a slow, agonizing death, with tubes down my throat and up my ass.
    I like my rifles like my women - short, light, fast, brown, and suppressed.

  8. #6658
    Site Supporter HeavyDuty's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Location
    Not very bright but does lack ambition
    Quote Originally Posted by Sensei View Post
    I’m an ICU physician at one of the busiest ECMO centers in the world (one of our faculty invented the technology 40 years ago). We cannulate about 150 people per year. I’ve been in the SICU for the past 4 weeks where we manage VV ECMO for respiratory failure. I’ve yet to see a COVID patient get de-cannulated and I’ve seen 2 die this month. We have 8 alive on the pump and all but 3 have been cannulated since before I arrived. The ones that have been cannulated for over a month are circling the drain, and the fresher ones show no real signs of lung recovery. Every one of them has required horse tranquilizer levels of sedation while on ECMO. This is in stark contrast to our institutional experience for non-COVID respiratory failure, and even our COVID experience in the Spring where 50% survived. Something has changed in this wave - they are younger but much sicker.


    Bottom line, there is no way in hell that I’d accept ECMO for COVID as I have no desire to die a slow, agonizing death, with tubes down my throat and up my ass.
    I think I need to update my advance directives...
    Ken

    BBI: ...”you better not forget the safe word because shit's about to get weird”...
    revchuck38: ...”mo' ammo is mo' betta' unless you're swimming or on fire.”

  9. #6659
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Canton GA
    Wife has some blood clotting - not covid related. I went in with her to see her vein DR in Marietta GA. He mentioned how busy they are 1) since GA is relatively open, they are seeing patients from all over US who are not allowed "elective" vein surgery in other parts of US and 2) surge of traveling nurses, etc. due to busy state of affairs, and 3) surge of bloodcotting and amputation issues due to covid.

  10. #6660
    Site Supporter
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Texas
    I think hospital survival rate depends on what docs and which nurses are running the icu's. My local hospitals long ago went to hiring nurses on a part time basis. Less group cohesion. Fewer opportunities for highly skilled to teach the others. More interpersonal bullshit.

User Tag List

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •