Last edited by seabiscuit; 03-17-2011 at 03:35 PM. Reason: typo
Praise be to the LORD my Rock,
who trains my hands for war,
my fingers for battle.
-Psalm 144:1
When I carry a 1911 in Alaska, it is a Colt Delta 10mm, using Tripp magazines, and it has yet to malfunction with any ammo I have tried (Buffalo Bore and Corbon 200 grain penetrators, Corbon and Double Tap Barnes X bullets, old Black Talon, Hornady XTP's, Federal Hydra Shocks and Winchester Silvertips.) Interestingly, I have three Glock 20's, two SF models and one pre SF, none of which will run the 200 grain penetrator loads from Corbon or Buffalo Bore reliably, which kind of argues against the reason for a 10 mm Glock in Alaska. Interestingly, my wife carries a Glock 29, and it runs those 200 grain penetrator loads and the Barnes X bullets just fine.
When I do carry a 45 up here, it is an HK 45 with Ranger +P or the Corbon DPX +P ammo.
I choose to carry a .45 ACP pistol when:
-- The pistol design being used works best in .45 ACP (ex. 1911)
-- Intermediate barriers may be a common obstacle
-- Larger animals are a potential threat
-- When .45 ACP ammunition is provided for free in larger quantities than other calibers
-- When restricted by illogical, asinine regulations that restrict magazine capacity to 10 rds or less
Probably true, but carrying big heavy guns is more about having a good gun belt and having a holster that holds it high and tight than it is about the gun itself, imo.
That said I carry 9mm and would only carry a 45 if I were in a mag-limiting state like CA -- in which case I'd go single-stack 45, e.g. a 1911 (assuming I could carry at all in such a state).
I love my 1911 and shoot it pretty well but everyday carry it's just to big and heavy
i prefer my kahr p9 or glock 23 for ccw