Make sure you guys contact Smith and Wesson and ask for the return of these models. Using a no lock 642 as the base!
Make sure you guys contact Smith and Wesson and ask for the return of these models. Using a no lock 642 as the base!
I am constantly amazed at how often Smith & Wesson has come up with a good idea, only to discontinue it within a year or so. I always hear it's because of poor sales but I would hope intrinsic worth might keep something in production, even if it doesn't turn out to be a top seller. Yea, I know. Silly me.
Dave
Last edited by Dave T; 01-09-2020 at 11:24 PM.
"For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
-- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --
Making a J frame slightly larger also potentially gives up one of the few advantages it has over a Ruger LCR.
Offering an interchangeable sight on a 2” barrel would seem like a good move.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Any legal information I may post is general information, and is not legal advice. Such information may or may not apply to your specific situation. I am not your attorney unless an attorney-client relationship is separately and privately established.
I don't see a 5/8" increase in barrel length as destroying the "pocketability" of the J-frame and the slight increase in performance and sight radius would be worth it to me. Although I prefer the greater ejector length, I don't see reloading as a realistic possibility other than administrative. And I would have thought most of those folks who clammer for a 3" J-frame or Ruger LCR would have jumped on these Smiths. Guess not, so I'll crawl back under my rock. (smile)
Dave
There are 3-inch 337s and 360s. They go for a lot of money when they occasionally hit GB.
.
-----------------------------------------
Not another dime.
After two years of sorting out my old timers snubby carry where I pitted the Kimber K6, the new Colt Cobra and the Smith 640 Pro, the only snubby I have left is the Kimber K6. That being said, I would buy at least one if not 2 of the 2.5" 642 Centennials with the no lock. I think this upgrades the Smith into a much better catagory because of the improved front sight and the easy option to pin in a custom sight.
Wish I knew these were out originally.