I predict that move would really blow up in their face. That really bombed in focus group testing; no sense fragmenting their product line.Originally Posted by HCM
I predict that move would really blow up in their face. That really bombed in focus group testing; no sense fragmenting their product line.
--Josh
“Formerly we suffered from crimes; now we suffer from laws.” - Tacitus.
Your comments may be perceived as anti-personnel by Glock employees.
There's nothing civil about this war.
They were making these for the Austrian and other NATO military before they came out with their pistol.
In other words they were a great company before they were gun company.
The grenade has a polymer body with steel ball bearings mixed into the explosive material providing the frag.
Finally? Are we just going to ignore the Glock 22?
And for Portland PB at least, the Glock 21.
Every time this happens, I get a little hopey that we'll see a Glock 19 sized .22, or a Glock 9mm PCC, but it's probably gonna be like Lucy promising Charlie Brown she'll let him kick the football for real next time.
I was into 10mm Auto before it sold out and went mainstream, but these days I'm here for the revolver and epidemiology information.
They had enough humor to make the Glock 45 a 9mm. I think that making the Glock 44 a .22LR would be pretty cute. However, I don't think it'll happen because it's harder to achieve very high reliability with rimfires. I could see Glock worrying that a bad bucket of bulk .22 would tarnish Perfection.
Make it a 48 equivalent in .380 and offer a factory barrel in 32 NAA. I'd buy three.
”But in the end all of these ideas just manufacture new criminals when the problem isn't a lack of criminals.” -JRB
I was going the ask why but realized you weren't serious, just mocking Glock's hype.
Dave
No, I'd totally buy one. Launching mini 357 Sig from a 10+1 round ~4" barrel would be hilariously fun.
Reply With Quote
