I know it's hard for the sharks to think about anything but biting when there's blood in the water.
Lets think about that for a second. Since the officer resigned, we will know even less. His boss gets on the news and says he's going to fire him, so the officer resigns. What exactly was FWPD interested in finding out from the officers if they had already decided to kick him to the curb?
Under Garrity V New Jersey, FWPD can force an employee to participate in an administrative investigation, that investigation is separate from a criminal investigation and the findings are not admissible in criminal court. Emphasis on the employee part. So as far as finding out what happened, the folks that had the ball in their court, fumbled. The resignation took care of this. If the officer was fired, essentially for "just because" (no actual internal investigation could have possibly been completed), and the officer got acquitted at trial, he could get his job back under civil service.
If the people at the top can't get it together, should we really be surprised by what's trickling down hill.
One of the things I’m pretty sure we are seeing here is business as usual, that didn’t end up being business as usual. I don’t think this guy is the train wreck he’s made out to be, this is the time that doing things bass ackwards like everyone else does didn’t work out. I don't think he should get out of this unscathed, he's an adult and makes his own choices, but the whole scapegoat thing means that the opportunity to make sure this doesn't happen again is going to be lost.