--Jason--
I have avoided buying one because I’m concerned I’d carry it.
Ignore Alien Orders
I went back and forth on pocket carrying a G42 for a few months.
I'm currently back to a Kahr PM9.
It's hard to justify the G42 .380 when I get the exact same number of 9mm rounds in a fractionally smaller dimensioned package (although slightly heavier) with the Kahr.
I also prefer the PM9's revolver like trigger for pocket carry.
The usual caveat with Kahrs must apply though... mine has proven itself absolutely reliable (after a bit of tinkering when I first got it).
My G42 OTOH has been 100% with Underwood +P Penetrators but very inconsistent with FMJ practice ammo (so kinda confidence inspiring and kinda not).
The only reason I keep a J-frame (M&P 340) around is because it has a Clip-Draw installed on it and makes late evening runs to the alley trash can (or the car in a motel parking lot) in basketball shorts and flip-flops a grab-n-go affair.
"For a moment he felt good about this. A moment or two later he felt bad about feeling good about it. Then he felt good about feeling bad about feeling good about it and, satisfied, drove on into the night."
-- Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy --
I think one reason I have held onto the 642 with wadcutters is the fact the wadcutter has been used to put down wounded animals for years. I dont know why I would think the j frame would do a better job on a wounded animal than a warm 380. I probably (I hope) stand a better chance of a finishing shot on a deer than I do a human. I guess that would come down to penetration.
My wife used to frequently carry a 42 when the 43 was too large for her attire, but since she got a 365, it has replaced 42/43/43X.
Likes pretty much everything in every caliber.