Posting this since thread is going/is already full
Plus I want to trigger #KetoFagz
Don’t blame me. I didn’t vote for that dumb bastard.
The Minority Marksman.
"When you meet a swordsman, draw your sword: Do not recite poetry to one who is not a poet."
-a Ch'an Buddhist axiom.
So when you talk about the performance trade off, are you talking about the first DA pull like on my type G Storms?
But if I’m understanding the type C correctly- I had to watch a YouTube video to better understand it because the google searched article I found was practically useless but, isn’t the only difference between a C and the D is that the D is the long DA pull every shot like the first shot of an F and a G, and the C is pretty much a half-cocked- every shot like the second and on shots of a F/G storm?
But how exactly is a C safe if it starts off from half-cock position? I realize it’s not totally like one of my Storms that’s fully cocked back but how much less of a pull and how much less of a poundage-pull is the C?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
No, I haven’t. I don’t own a Glock and I only know of two people that have them.
But instead of watching a video that I really don’t think will show me anything, what’s the difference between how a Glock “trigger safety” works and anything else that has one? Or better yet, the Ruger LC9S “trigger safety”...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
With the Type C you essentially have a constant trigger pull. The hammer is partially cocked; the trigger pull weight (and perhaps more importantly, travel distance) will more closely resemble your FS/G model DA pull for every shot. The hammer is never fully cocked.
In my mind, the safety advantage of a Type C (or any DAO/LEM action) over a traditional DA/SA (i.e. FS or G) model is that the user does not have to remember to decock the pistol prior to holstering. There is one less control for the user to operate (no need for a decocker or hammer drop safety as there is nothing to decock) resulting in a simpler manual of arms to master. Arguably the greatest potential for a mishap with a DA/SA pistol is after the pistol has been fired and prior to holstering. If the user fails to decock the handgun, all that is mechanically preventing discharge is the short and light SA trigger press (quite possibly lighter and shorter than many of the striker-fired trigger pulls that have been maligned in this thread).
As far as the performance trade-off, a heavier trigger for every shot is a heavier trigger for every shot. A heavier trigger is harder to shoot accidentally; it is also harder to shoot as fast and accurately as a lighter trigger. Again, what are the user's priorities?
Much of this comes down to training. A DA/SA pistol, regardless of whether it is F or G type, is not inherently safer than a striker-fired design unless the user properly applies the safety device. I think a DA/SA pistol offers a great deal to the knowledgeable user willing to invest the time but it has drawbacks too. As I said earlier when I quoted Todd's parable on action types, they're all good, and they're all bad. Everything is a compromise.
Last edited by JSGlock34; 09-18-2019 at 08:38 PM.
"When the phone rang, Parker was in the garage, killing a man."